<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $278 Million A Year In Geothermal Benefits For US</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/13/278-million-a-year-in-geothermal-benefits-for-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/13/278-million-a-year-in-geothermal-benefits-for-us/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/13/278-million-a-year-in-geothermal-benefits-for-us/#comment-166403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 07:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52735#comment-166403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesWimberley</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/13/278-million-a-year-in-geothermal-benefits-for-us/#comment-166194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesWimberley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52735#comment-166194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Yale estimate is very, very conservative. Here&#039;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://mitei.mit.edu/system/files/geothermal-energy-1-3.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MIT 2006 report&lt;/a&gt; on the potential of EGS: &lt;blockquote&gt;Using reasonable assumptions regarding how heat  would  be  mined  from  stimulated  EGS  reservoirs,  we  also  estimated  the  extractable  portion  to exceed 200,000 EJ or about 2,000 times the annual consumption of primary energy in the United States in 2005.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
There is more than enough geothermal energy to power the planet. It&#039;s safe, unobtrusive and 24/7/12 reliable - better than anything else available. The question is of course cost, which is an endogenous variable at the 2050 horizon  There are signs Energy Secretary Moniz will at last back the struggling EGS pioneers with some serious research money. Traditional hydrothermal power is growing steadily, but its potential is limited outside a few regions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Yale estimate is very, very conservative. Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://mitei.mit.edu/system/files/geothermal-energy-1-3.pdf" rel="nofollow">MIT 2006 report</a> on the potential of EGS:<br />
<blockquote>Using reasonable assumptions regarding how heat  would  be  mined  from  stimulated  EGS  reservoirs,  we  also  estimated  the  extractable  portion  to exceed 200,000 EJ or about 2,000 times the annual consumption of primary energy in the United States in 2005.</p></blockquote>
<p>There is more than enough geothermal energy to power the planet. It&#8217;s safe, unobtrusive and 24/7/12 reliable &#8211; better than anything else available. The question is of course cost, which is an endogenous variable at the 2050 horizon  There are signs Energy Secretary Moniz will at last back the struggling EGS pioneers with some serious research money. Traditional hydrothermal power is growing steadily, but its potential is limited outside a few regions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/13/278-million-a-year-in-geothermal-benefits-for-us/#comment-166169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52735#comment-166169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geothermal is also dispatchable.  Unlike other thermal generation like gas, coal and nuclear which can take hours to day to heat back up, geothermal keeps itself hot and ready.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geothermal is also dispatchable.  Unlike other thermal generation like gas, coal and nuclear which can take hours to day to heat back up, geothermal keeps itself hot and ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jburt56</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/13/278-million-a-year-in-geothermal-benefits-for-us/#comment-166167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jburt56]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52735#comment-166167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geothermal is a great way to provide 24/7 power.  Can you DIG it??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geothermal is a great way to provide 24/7 power.  Can you DIG it??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
