<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 MW Lithium-Ion Energy Storage System Unveiled In Oregon &#8212; Will Provide Storage For Intermittent Renewable Energy Sources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: agelbert</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-192261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[agelbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-192261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you. I will.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. I will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crtoca</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-191795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crtoca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-191795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vanadium Redox Flow batteries can be sized to the capacity and energy requirements of the user, with no degradation from cycling.  See the Gills Onions project we developed 600kW for 6 hours = 3.6 MHW.  Different technologies have different capabilities.http://www.energystorageexchange.org/projects/2]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vanadium Redox Flow batteries can be sized to the capacity and energy requirements of the user, with no degradation from cycling.  See the Gills Onions project we developed 600kW for 6 hours = 3.6 MHW.  Different technologies have different capabilities.<a href="http://www.energystorageexchange.org/projects/2" rel="nofollow">http://www.energystorageexchange.org/projects/2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexVigneault</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-165697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AlexVigneault]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-165697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone knows who is the battery provider?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone knows who is the battery provider?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G.</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-165661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-165661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry Dave2020.  I didn&#039;t understand what you were looking for.  Here is some additional information that may help.

Portland General Electric (PGE) is developing an inverter-battery (1 MW - 240 kWh) at NREL before installation of a full size testing and demonstration of the 5 MW - 1200 kWh rated device.


Hope this answers your question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Dave2020.  I didn&#8217;t understand what you were looking for.  Here is some additional information that may help.</p>
<p>Portland General Electric (PGE) is developing an inverter-battery (1 MW &#8211; 240 kWh) at NREL before installation of a full size testing and demonstration of the 5 MW &#8211; 1200 kWh rated device.</p>
<p>Hope this answers your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave2020</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-165618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave2020]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-165618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You miss my point Tom.

There&#039;s only one number we need to know, and that is - the battery - ?MWh.

5MW doesn&#039;t tell us anything meaningful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You miss my point Tom.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s only one number we need to know, and that is &#8211; the battery &#8211; ?MWh.</p>
<p>5MW doesn&#8217;t tell us anything meaningful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agelbert</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-165600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[agelbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 03:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-165600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you. I&#039;ll check the link. I think I&#039;m starting to understand the discharge rate better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. I&#8217;ll check the link. I think I&#8217;m starting to understand the discharge rate better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-165581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-165581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a look at the Trojan link I provided.  It shows that if you discharge faster then you have less usable power.  The T-105 RE will give you 146 AH at a 2 hour discharge rate but 240 AH at a 48 hour discharge rate.

I&#039;m assuming that fast discharging causes the battery to heat up and heat = lost energy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at the Trojan link I provided.  It shows that if you discharge faster then you have less usable power.  The T-105 RE will give you 146 AH at a 2 hour discharge rate but 240 AH at a 48 hour discharge rate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming that fast discharging causes the battery to heat up and heat = lost energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-165580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-165580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Certainly not a battery wizard, but I do have 20 years of living with batteries attached to solar panels.

Up until very recently deep cycle/thick plate lead acid batteries were the most common storage for off the grid.  I&#039;m sure some people were using something else, but I&#039;ve never encountered one of those people.

Apparently lead-acid batteries, the kinds available until lately, don&#039;t do well if completely discharged.  So people, in general, would try to avoid more than a 20% discharge and use enough batteries to carry them for 2-3 sunless days.  

Trojan has recently released a new thicker plate battery designed for off-grid storage.  It&#039;s rated at 4,000 20% DoD cycles or 1,000 100% DoD cycles.  4,000 cycles is about 11 years of daily discharge.  Their regular golf cart batteries are good for 5-7 years.

http://www.trojanbatteryre.com/PDF/datasheets/T105RE_TrojanRE_Data_Sheets.pdf  

The idea is to size your battery bank so that it will carry you through a short period of no sunshine.  Perhaps 2-3 days.  Start with your daily use and work back.

If you need 3 kWh to get through a winter day then you need 9 kWh to get through 3 days. 

If you&#039;re going to use 6 volt batteries then you need 8 in parallel (8 strings) to give you 48 volts.  You&#039;re going to store 1/8th of the needed power in each string.  So, in this case 9,000 Wh / 8 = 1125 Wh / 6 volts = 187.5 aH per string.

If you are willing to discharge your battery 100% then a single T-105 RE would do.  They are 240 AH at 6 volts each when discharged slowly.  If you want to stick with 20% maximum discharge then you&#039;d need about four per string.



WARNING:  I&#039;m not sure I&#039;ve got my math correct.  I&#039;m sticking it up for others to crank through and confirm or shoot down.


And I suspect that if you did use 100% discharge you might find your inverter shut down when battery voltage reached a certain point.  Mine does, but that might be adjustable.  Check rather than assume.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly not a battery wizard, but I do have 20 years of living with batteries attached to solar panels.</p>
<p>Up until very recently deep cycle/thick plate lead acid batteries were the most common storage for off the grid.  I&#8217;m sure some people were using something else, but I&#8217;ve never encountered one of those people.</p>
<p>Apparently lead-acid batteries, the kinds available until lately, don&#8217;t do well if completely discharged.  So people, in general, would try to avoid more than a 20% discharge and use enough batteries to carry them for 2-3 sunless days.  </p>
<p>Trojan has recently released a new thicker plate battery designed for off-grid storage.  It&#8217;s rated at 4,000 20% DoD cycles or 1,000 100% DoD cycles.  4,000 cycles is about 11 years of daily discharge.  Their regular golf cart batteries are good for 5-7 years.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.trojanbatteryre.com/PDF/datasheets/T105RE_TrojanRE_Data_Sheets.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.trojanbatteryre.com/PDF/datasheets/T105RE_TrojanRE_Data_Sheets.pdf</a>  </p>
<p>The idea is to size your battery bank so that it will carry you through a short period of no sunshine.  Perhaps 2-3 days.  Start with your daily use and work back.</p>
<p>If you need 3 kWh to get through a winter day then you need 9 kWh to get through 3 days. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to use 6 volt batteries then you need 8 in parallel (8 strings) to give you 48 volts.  You&#8217;re going to store 1/8th of the needed power in each string.  So, in this case 9,000 Wh / 8 = 1125 Wh / 6 volts = 187.5 aH per string.</p>
<p>If you are willing to discharge your battery 100% then a single T-105 RE would do.  They are 240 AH at 6 volts each when discharged slowly.  If you want to stick with 20% maximum discharge then you&#8217;d need about four per string.</p>
<p>WARNING:  I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve got my math correct.  I&#8217;m sticking it up for others to crank through and confirm or shoot down.</p>
<p>And I suspect that if you did use 100% discharge you might find your inverter shut down when battery voltage reached a certain point.  Mine does, but that might be adjustable.  Check rather than assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agelbert</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-165571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[agelbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-165571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been researching battery storage capacity and there seems to be a lot of confusion out there. For a PV system, the battery capacity is supposed to be 1 1/2 to 2 times the incoming PV energy of your panels. BUT, the battery energy (Amps times volts) VARIES according to 100 hour, 20 hour or 5 hour discharge rate. When they say said battery has 305 ah at 48V on a 100 hour discharge rate, does that mean I will JUST GET 3.05 kwh per hour for 100 hours? 
To  make matters more complicated, unless you a are dealing with a NI-Fe type battery that can be safely discharged several times in a several decade period, you have to make sure you do not discharge a battery bank below a certain percentage of charge. 
It&#039;s very frustrating and I wish they would just say, &quot;IF you have ZERO kilowatts coming in, this battery bank will provide 100% of 1 kw for X amount of hours. That way, if you have a 15 kilowatt demand on power, you know the battery will last one fifteenth of X time so you buy enough to get your time up to the anticipated dead period in a power failure.
Anyway, for the 5MW battery bank in the article, how long can it put out 100% of 5MW without overly discharging? 24 hours? Longer? Does anybody know? 
Help from any battery wizard out there would be welcomed. :&gt;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been researching battery storage capacity and there seems to be a lot of confusion out there. For a PV system, the battery capacity is supposed to be 1 1/2 to 2 times the incoming PV energy of your panels. BUT, the battery energy (Amps times volts) VARIES according to 100 hour, 20 hour or 5 hour discharge rate. When they say said battery has 305 ah at 48V on a 100 hour discharge rate, does that mean I will JUST GET 3.05 kwh per hour for 100 hours?<br />
To  make matters more complicated, unless you a are dealing with a NI-Fe type battery that can be safely discharged several times in a several decade period, you have to make sure you do not discharge a battery bank below a certain percentage of charge.<br />
It&#8217;s very frustrating and I wish they would just say, &#8220;IF you have ZERO kilowatts coming in, this battery bank will provide 100% of 1 kw for X amount of hours. That way, if you have a 15 kilowatt demand on power, you know the battery will last one fifteenth of X time so you buy enough to get your time up to the anticipated dead period in a power failure.<br />
Anyway, for the 5MW battery bank in the article, how long can it put out 100% of 5MW without overly discharging? 24 hours? Longer? Does anybody know?<br />
Help from any battery wizard out there would be welcomed. :&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeroen</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-165550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeroen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-165550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For that price you can give more then 300 people a Tesla Model S with a total storage capacity of 25Mwh. :-) ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For that price you can give more then 300 people a Tesla Model S with a total storage capacity of 25Mwh. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G.</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-165502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-165502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Dave2020:

I understand your frustration the way some things come out in the news.  Having said that lets try to see why its really tough to put numbers to everything.  

First of all 500 customers is quite small so if its midday and Monday through Friday; all the people are up, t.v.&#039;s are running, toasters going, washing machines and electric dryers are running, lights are on and the AC is cycling off and on if its summer.  My GUESS, and I am of course guessing, the average per household consumption would be about 10-30 kWh&#039;s per home for some given time period.  

Now lets say the electric grid goes down in the evening instead of during the day.  This time it&#039;s after dinner, the kids are in bed, windows are open since its a nice summer evening, so AC is off, washer and dryer have stopped, showers have been taken and basically its dad and mom watching a little TV before they go to bed. Their home might be, and again this is a guess, drawing 2 or 3 kWh from the grid.

As you can see the ration or change between say some average of about 20 kWh daytime use to about 3 kWh in the evening is significant; and to further complicate things it depends on where the community is located.  The electrical usage patterns are different for rural areas than for say multi-family dwellings.  Multi family dwellings typically have fewer sq.ft. per family member and therefor typically consume less energy but this is certainly not always true. 

So if you happen to live in the area, pull out your electric bills for let&#039;s say the last 6 months and total up the kWh&#039;s used.  Divide that by 6 and then again by 30 and you will get some idea of what your home is using per day [ 24 hour time period].  That should give you some idea what a typical home in the area [if your home is typical] is using. 

If those 500 homes are like yours and the people living in those homes live about the same way as you do, then you will have some approximation of how long those 500 homes could be served.  But remember we haven&#039;t factored in TIME YET.  The time when the grid goes down is going to effect how long you can continue to watch T.V.  Is it summer or winter or daytime or nighttime.  Is it a retirement community or does it have a younger population.  Are there any big energy consumers and will they be automatically taken offline when the grid goes down.  All factors we haven&#039;t taken into consideration yet.   

Hope this helps a little.  Have a great day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave2020:</p>
<p>I understand your frustration the way some things come out in the news.  Having said that lets try to see why its really tough to put numbers to everything.  </p>
<p>First of all 500 customers is quite small so if its midday and Monday through Friday; all the people are up, t.v.&#8217;s are running, toasters going, washing machines and electric dryers are running, lights are on and the AC is cycling off and on if its summer.  My GUESS, and I am of course guessing, the average per household consumption would be about 10-30 kWh&#8217;s per home for some given time period.  </p>
<p>Now lets say the electric grid goes down in the evening instead of during the day.  This time it&#8217;s after dinner, the kids are in bed, windows are open since its a nice summer evening, so AC is off, washer and dryer have stopped, showers have been taken and basically its dad and mom watching a little TV before they go to bed. Their home might be, and again this is a guess, drawing 2 or 3 kWh from the grid.</p>
<p>As you can see the ration or change between say some average of about 20 kWh daytime use to about 3 kWh in the evening is significant; and to further complicate things it depends on where the community is located.  The electrical usage patterns are different for rural areas than for say multi-family dwellings.  Multi family dwellings typically have fewer sq.ft. per family member and therefor typically consume less energy but this is certainly not always true. </p>
<p>So if you happen to live in the area, pull out your electric bills for let&#8217;s say the last 6 months and total up the kWh&#8217;s used.  Divide that by 6 and then again by 30 and you will get some idea of what your home is using per day [ 24 hour time period].  That should give you some idea what a typical home in the area [if your home is typical] is using. </p>
<p>If those 500 homes are like yours and the people living in those homes live about the same way as you do, then you will have some approximation of how long those 500 homes could be served.  But remember we haven&#8217;t factored in TIME YET.  The time when the grid goes down is going to effect how long you can continue to watch T.V.  Is it summer or winter or daytime or nighttime.  Is it a retirement community or does it have a younger population.  Are there any big energy consumers and will they be automatically taken offline when the grid goes down.  All factors we haven&#8217;t taken into consideration yet.   </p>
<p>Hope this helps a little.  Have a great day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Williamson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-165490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne Williamson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-165490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At 600 dollars a kilowatt for the batteries(3 million for 5MW) and another 100k for the inverters(guessing), just wondering what the other 20 million was for?

Dave2020, good question, if they are using 5kw then it would be two hours.  If they only use 1kw per hour then 10 hours.  Probably some where in between.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 600 dollars a kilowatt for the batteries(3 million for 5MW) and another 100k for the inverters(guessing), just wondering what the other 20 million was for?</p>
<p>Dave2020, good question, if they are using 5kw then it would be two hours.  If they only use 1kw per hour then 10 hours.  Probably some where in between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave2020</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-165486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave2020]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 14:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-165486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;about 500 customers in the area will be able to retain power even during regional electrical blackouts.&quot; 

For five minutes? For half an hour? Nobody wants to say, not even PNNL.
https://www.pnnl.gov/news/release.aspx?id=990]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;about 500 customers in the area will be able to retain power even during regional electrical blackouts.&#8221; </p>
<p>For five minutes? For half an hour? Nobody wants to say, not even PNNL.<br />
<a href="https://www.pnnl.gov/news/release.aspx?id=990" rel="nofollow">https://www.pnnl.gov/news/release.aspx?id=990</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: globi</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/09/5-mw-lithium-ion-energy-storage-system-unveiled-in-oregon-will-provide-storage-for-intermittent-renewable-energy-sources/#comment-165466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[globi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 09:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52572#comment-165466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Northwest has plenty of flexible hydro, which can easily deal with intermittent power resources.
And keep in mind all power plants are intermittent - or do you know of any single nuclear or coal power plant which has never needed any refueling or maintenance?

If anything please title it as a microgrid back-up system and not storage for intermittent power resources.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Northwest has plenty of flexible hydro, which can easily deal with intermittent power resources.<br />
And keep in mind all power plants are intermittent &#8211; or do you know of any single nuclear or coal power plant which has never needed any refueling or maintenance?</p>
<p>If anything please title it as a microgrid back-up system and not storage for intermittent power resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
