<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Official: 2013 Nissan Leaf Rated At 115 MPGe, 75 Miles On 90% Charge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/25/official-2013-nissan-leaf-rated-at-115-mpge-75-miles-on-90-charge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/25/official-2013-nissan-leaf-rated-at-115-mpge-75-miles-on-90-charge/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 04:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wattleberry</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/25/official-2013-nissan-leaf-rated-at-115-mpge-75-miles-on-90-charge/#comment-163074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wattleberry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52112#comment-163074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CleanTechnica is read by,and sourced from, many people outside the US using different units of measurements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CleanTechnica is read by,and sourced from, many people outside the US using different units of measurements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlmur</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/25/official-2013-nissan-leaf-rated-at-115-mpge-75-miles-on-90-charge/#comment-163032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlmur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52112#comment-163032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s the confusion?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the confusion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlmur</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/25/official-2013-nissan-leaf-rated-at-115-mpge-75-miles-on-90-charge/#comment-163031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlmur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52112#comment-163031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you should compare it to the Chevy Spark.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should compare it to the Chevy Spark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wattleberry</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/25/official-2013-nissan-leaf-rated-at-115-mpge-75-miles-on-90-charge/#comment-162997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wattleberry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52112#comment-162997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I take it that this is US mpg? Remember promising to include other equivalents to avoid ambiguity?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it that this is US mpg? Remember promising to include other equivalents to avoid ambiguity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
