<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon Tax Good For Climate And Economy, Says US Congressional Budget Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/25/carbon-tax-good-for-climate-and-economy-says-us-congressional-budget-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/25/carbon-tax-good-for-climate-and-economy-says-us-congressional-budget-office/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 15:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fireofenergy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/25/carbon-tax-good-for-climate-and-economy-says-us-congressional-budget-office/#comment-192532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fireofenergy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52110#comment-192532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is sad that it will most probably NOT go for the development of the machine automation of (clean energy) storage cheaper than lead acid. If it&#039;s a carbon tax, then, in order to have ANY credibility, it needs to support clean energy research and development for the CHEAP.


Merely &quot;paying off the debt&quot; with money that should go for the newly emergent machine automation of wind, solar and storage is totally taking away from the industrialism required to pay off the debt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is sad that it will most probably NOT go for the development of the machine automation of (clean energy) storage cheaper than lead acid. If it&#8217;s a carbon tax, then, in order to have ANY credibility, it needs to support clean energy research and development for the CHEAP.</p>
<p>Merely &#8220;paying off the debt&#8221; with money that should go for the newly emergent machine automation of wind, solar and storage is totally taking away from the industrialism required to pay off the debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/25/carbon-tax-good-for-climate-and-economy-says-us-congressional-budget-office/#comment-162975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=52110#comment-162975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good speech by Sheldon Whitehouse US Senator for Rhode Island. The religion isn&#039;t to my taste but he makes a good argument.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4Bx-y230hs]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good speech by Sheldon Whitehouse US Senator for Rhode Island. The religion isn&#8217;t to my taste but he makes a good argument.</p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='600' height='368' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/d4Bx-y230hs?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
