<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fluorescent Solar Cells The Future?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/19/fluorescent-solar-cells-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/19/fluorescent-solar-cells-the-future/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Diego Loves Green &#8211; Are Fluorescent Solar Cells The Future?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/19/fluorescent-solar-cells-the-future/#comment-162158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[San Diego Loves Green &#8211; Are Fluorescent Solar Cells The Future?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51844#comment-162158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] following story was originally published on the Yale News Website &amp; then reprinted on Clean Technica; image above: Scientists at Yale have improved the ability of a promising type of solar cell to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] following story was originally published on the Yale News Website &amp; then reprinted on Clean Technica; image above: Scientists at Yale have improved the ability of a promising type of solar cell to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mds</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/19/fluorescent-solar-cells-the-future/#comment-162140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51844#comment-162140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both!?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mds</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/19/fluorescent-solar-cells-the-future/#comment-162138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51844#comment-162138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking more like this one:
http://www.pv-tech.org/news/ucla_researchers_reach_10.6_efficiency_for_tandem_polymer_solar_cells

this one:
http://www.pv-tech.org/news/polyera_claims_9.1_power_conversion_efficiency_on_its_opv_cell

or this one:
http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/10/new-plasmonic-polymer-solar-cells-achieve-record-efficiency-of-8-92-highest-for-any-plasmonic-polymer-solar-cells-utilizing-metal-nanoparticles/

For plastic solar cells in the 13%-14% range.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking more like this one:<br />
<a href="http://www.pv-tech.org/news/ucla_researchers_reach_10.6_efficiency_for_tandem_polymer_solar_cells" rel="nofollow">http://www.pv-tech.org/news/ucla_researchers_reach_10.6_efficiency_for_tandem_polymer_solar_cells</a></p>
<p>this one:<br />
<a href="http://www.pv-tech.org/news/polyera_claims_9.1_power_conversion_efficiency_on_its_opv_cell" rel="nofollow">http://www.pv-tech.org/news/polyera_claims_9.1_power_conversion_efficiency_on_its_opv_cell</a></p>
<p>or this one:<br />
<a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/10/new-plasmonic-polymer-solar-cells-achieve-record-efficiency-of-8-92-highest-for-any-plasmonic-polymer-solar-cells-utilizing-metal-nanoparticles/" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/10/new-plasmonic-polymer-solar-cells-achieve-record-efficiency-of-8-92-highest-for-any-plasmonic-polymer-solar-cells-utilizing-metal-nanoparticles/</a></p>
<p>For plastic solar cells in the 13%-14% range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wattleberry</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/19/fluorescent-solar-cells-the-future/#comment-162134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wattleberry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51844#comment-162134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could this be combined with http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/19/inexpensive-solar-cell-coating-may-lead-to-big-increases-in-efficiency-new-technique-allows-one-photon-to-knock-loose-two-electrons/   to enhance efficiency further?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this be combined with <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/19/inexpensive-solar-cell-coating-may-lead-to-big-increases-in-efficiency-new-technique-allows-one-photon-to-knock-loose-two-electrons/" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/19/inexpensive-solar-cell-coating-may-lead-to-big-increases-in-efficiency-new-technique-allows-one-photon-to-knock-loose-two-electrons/</a>   to enhance efficiency further?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
