<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wales&#8217; First Full-Scale Tidal Energy Generator Receives Funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/08/wales-first-full-scale-tidal-energy-generator-receives-funding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/08/wales-first-full-scale-tidal-energy-generator-receives-funding/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 15:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave2020</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/08/wales-first-full-scale-tidal-energy-generator-receives-funding/#comment-160873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave2020]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 10:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51437#comment-160873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s be thankful for small mercies - &quot;a £1.6 million EU grant&#039; is very welcome, but it&#039;s a drop in the ocean.

The UK problem really lies long before any idea reaches the &#039;D&#039; of the R&amp;D. The Welsh government&#039;s interpretation of EU state-aid rules is that  research that fails to attract commercial support should not receive any public funding. So a grant of £1.6 thousand is routinely refused. That is the mother of all &#039;Catch-22&#039;s.

In fact, the climate for innovation is even worse than that, because research institutions (such as they are) in receipt of public funds are not allowed to &#039;own&#039; IPR in the UK. Try telling that to the Fraunhofer Gesellschaft - or MIT? - or thousands of other research bodies around the world.

Britain has a world-class talent for shooting itself in the foot - we invented the concept.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be thankful for small mercies &#8211; &#8220;a £1.6 million EU grant&#8217; is very welcome, but it&#8217;s a drop in the ocean.</p>
<p>The UK problem really lies long before any idea reaches the &#8216;D&#8217; of the R&amp;D. The Welsh government&#8217;s interpretation of EU state-aid rules is that  research that fails to attract commercial support should not receive any public funding. So a grant of £1.6 thousand is routinely refused. That is the mother of all &#8216;Catch-22&#8217;s.</p>
<p>In fact, the climate for innovation is even worse than that, because research institutions (such as they are) in receipt of public funds are not allowed to &#8216;own&#8217; IPR in the UK. Try telling that to the Fraunhofer Gesellschaft &#8211; or MIT? &#8211; or thousands of other research bodies around the world.</p>
<p>Britain has a world-class talent for shooting itself in the foot &#8211; we invented the concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
