<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s Afraid Of The Big, Bad Production Tax Credit For Wind Power?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/08/new-ge-brilliant-wind-turbine-sales-soar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/08/new-ge-brilliant-wind-turbine-sales-soar/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 12:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/08/new-ge-brilliant-wind-turbine-sales-soar/#comment-161018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 08:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51455#comment-161018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big bag oil industry huffed and puffed but couldn&#039;t blow the PTC down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big bag oil industry huffed and puffed but couldn&#8217;t blow the PTC down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiggity</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/08/new-ge-brilliant-wind-turbine-sales-soar/#comment-161000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shiggity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51455#comment-161000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well low wind value isn&#039;t really an argument anymore.  There&#039;s always good places for wind, you just have to find them.  Much of it is political.

Texas should also be #1 solar (their solar resource is almost as good as the sahara desert), but they have close to none.  That&#039;s purely political.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well low wind value isn&#8217;t really an argument anymore.  There&#8217;s always good places for wind, you just have to find them.  Much of it is political.</p>
<p>Texas should also be #1 solar (their solar resource is almost as good as the sahara desert), but they have close to none.  That&#8217;s purely political.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mk1313</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/08/new-ge-brilliant-wind-turbine-sales-soar/#comment-160907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mk1313]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51455#comment-160907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are the null states due to a lack of information, low wind values or due to political opposition?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the null states due to a lack of information, low wind values or due to political opposition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeple</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/08/new-ge-brilliant-wind-turbine-sales-soar/#comment-160894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 13:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51455#comment-160894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great to see Congress still has time to support their cronies at GE. I&#039;m all for setting a subsidy equal to the price of natural gas fired power. Since gas can burn when it&#039;s needed and wind tends to blow when it is not, that seems generous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see Congress still has time to support their cronies at GE. I&#8217;m all for setting a subsidy equal to the price of natural gas fired power. Since gas can burn when it&#8217;s needed and wind tends to blow when it is not, that seems generous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
