Going with SCs in a cell phone would mean having to charge several times per day, perhaps as many as 10x, rather than once.

There’s nothing new about supercapacitors charging very quickly. That’s simply a characteristic of supercapacitors. And they are good for hundreds of thousands of charge/discharge cycles.

Supercapacitors would be the perfect storage medium – if they held enough charge per volume/weight. Existing supercapacitors have energy densities that are approximately 10% of a conventional battery.

I see nothing on line saying that Eesha has invented a supercapacitor that stores as much energy as do batteries.

You got any capacity stats?

And I see a claim that her supercapacitor can last 10,000 cycles. Supercapacitors are good for more like a million cycles.

How about we hold off on the celebration until we find out how much energy her device holds? And if it will actually perform thousands of cycles without failing. There’s a lot of rough road between something that looks promising in the lab and something that delivers in the real world.

Your claim about grid solar power is simply false.

And I’ll need to see some proof that “Germany is fast tracking 30 New Coal fire power generator station to be built”

Here’s what I believe to be the facts…

Germany’s new coal burning plants are replacing (not adding to) the older plants that either have been or will soon be decommissioned. Construction on those plants was begun before the decision to close nuclear plants was made and before large amounts of wind and solar were planned.

By 2020, 18.5 gigawatts of coal power capacity will be decommissioned, whereas only 11.3 gigawatts will be newly installed.

Furthermore those plants will be more efficient, releasing less CO2 per unit electricity produced than are the ones they are replacing. And the new coal plants are partially load-following.

Now, one of us is clearly wrong. Feel free to bring your facts.

Why don’t you put your time to better use and learn something useful?

Take this challenge. Run a town only on the power from a single nuclear reactor. Watch what happens when that reactor shuts down for refueling or maintenance.

I get the feeling that you don’t quite grasp how grids work. “no energy in it” was the clue….

On the radio a challenge put forth to the infrastructure, a test was to shut down a street which had installed all grid solar power capacity and run the homes directly off the grid solar power with a small input of grid main power to assist the grid inverters to stay on, in that street which tried the test the system collapsed to even the grid inverter blowing up. The whole street became a dead short, providing proof of solar energy is a failure cannot provide base load energy to the household or the network.