<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wisconsin Wins Coal Battle, Loses Energy War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 08:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfreed27</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jfreed27]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The intermittent nature of solar and wind has been solved, e.g.  in the case of Colo. renewables.  It is always blowing somewhere, so programs simply need to select those (the ones that are somewhere) turbines. THis is not an insurmountable problem and no reason to halt development.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The intermittent nature of solar and wind has been solved, e.g.  in the case of Colo. renewables.  It is always blowing somewhere, so programs simply need to select those (the ones that are somewhere) turbines. THis is not an insurmountable problem and no reason to halt development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, I&#039;ll go slow.


We are installing renewables and cutting back on fossil fuels.


Renewables have extremely small lifetime carbon footprints.


We can install as much renewable generation as we want without creating CO2 problems.


If some people what to use a lot of electricity the most logical solution is to let them.  Charge them extra for the extra they consume.


Use that extra revenue to install more renewables.


There is no need to increase rates for &quot;normal&quot; consumers.  In fact, renewables should give us cheaper electricity later on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;ll go slow.</p>
<p>We are installing renewables and cutting back on fossil fuels.</p>
<p>Renewables have extremely small lifetime carbon footprints.</p>
<p>We can install as much renewable generation as we want without creating CO2 problems.</p>
<p>If some people what to use a lot of electricity the most logical solution is to let them.  Charge them extra for the extra they consume.</p>
<p>Use that extra revenue to install more renewables.</p>
<p>There is no need to increase rates for &#8220;normal&#8221; consumers.  In fact, renewables should give us cheaper electricity later on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skip</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don’t understand your answer, the idea of investing in renewable energy is to stop C02 emission, conserve energy, and use less not use more.  Higher energy charges will only lead to people living without power and there will be no point in investing in renewable if there is no one to purchase it. High end users like those with grid connected solar power have the means to reduce energy reliance on fossil fuel though that ought to be a tax placed upon them for using more energy than before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t understand your answer, the idea of investing in renewable energy is to stop C02 emission, conserve energy, and use less not use more.  Higher energy charges will only lead to people living without power and there will be no point in investing in renewable if there is no one to purchase it. High end users like those with grid connected solar power have the means to reduce energy reliance on fossil fuel though that ought to be a tax placed upon them for using more energy than before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How are you obtaining your electricity during prolonged periods of low sunshine?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are you obtaining your electricity during prolonged periods of low sunshine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Deans 2013</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Deans 2013]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m talking about personal responsibility for global warming everyone has to contribute, not someone take all for themselves. Like grid connected solar power people, then point the finger at those who don’t or can’t afford to do the same thing. Personally I have reduced my CO2 emissions the point where I be no longer be depended upon the grid and having the poles and wires removed from my property so I can certify myself as a true CO2 reduction person, not to be called a liar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m talking about personal responsibility for global warming everyone has to contribute, not someone take all for themselves. Like grid connected solar power people, then point the finger at those who don’t or can’t afford to do the same thing. Personally I have reduced my CO2 emissions the point where I be no longer be depended upon the grid and having the poles and wires removed from my property so I can certify myself as a true CO2 reduction person, not to be called a liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, Skip.  


High users need to pay higher rates.


That extra revenue can be used to install more renewable capacity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Skip.  </p>
<p>High users need to pay higher rates.</p>
<p>That extra revenue can be used to install more renewable capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skip</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you well force them off the grid? I don&#039;t think that a good answer to conserving energy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you well force them off the grid? I don&#8217;t think that a good answer to conserving energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you got lost somewhere along the way, Tony.

No one is talking about anyone using as much fossil fuel produced electricity as they want.  We&#039;re talking about renewable energy - wind, solar, geothermal, hydro, tidal, biomass/gas.

The planet is in no way running out of energy.  We won&#039;t have an energy problem for a few billion years.  


And at least a billion years before that we will have already been cooked out of existence by our self-destructing sun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you got lost somewhere along the way, Tony.</p>
<p>No one is talking about anyone using as much fossil fuel produced electricity as they want.  We&#8217;re talking about renewable energy &#8211; wind, solar, geothermal, hydro, tidal, biomass/gas.</p>
<p>The planet is in no way running out of energy.  We won&#8217;t have an energy problem for a few billion years.  </p>
<p>And at least a billion years before that we will have already been cooked out of existence by our self-destructing sun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Deans 2013</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Deans 2013]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You got to be mad to say that you can use as much energy as you like you will be polluting the planet with more CO2 emission. Law enforcement through legislation will impose penalties on people with solar arrays the used more energy than before, the idea is to conserve energy, not to use more energy like you think. Have you not read that the planet is running  out of energy or do you think it’s a free for all for everyone, I may as will start polluting the planet myself if I think in that way, uses much CO2 as I like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got to be mad to say that you can use as much energy as you like you will be polluting the planet with more CO2 emission. Law enforcement through legislation will impose penalties on people with solar arrays the used more energy than before, the idea is to conserve energy, not to use more energy like you think. Have you not read that the planet is running  out of energy or do you think it’s a free for all for everyone, I may as will start polluting the planet myself if I think in that way, uses much CO2 as I like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unnecessary and counterproductive.


People are conserving without even realizing it.  Our appliances and gadgets are getting more and more efficient.  Replace your 15-20 year old refrigerator and you&#039;ll get one the same size that uses 2x to 4x less electricity.  Replace your burned out incandescent light bulb and your options at the store will use 4x less electricity.


Then, for those few people who never close their refrigerator doors and have 12 big screen TVs going in every room - just charge a lot more for higher electricity use.  Tiered rates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unnecessary and counterproductive.</p>
<p>People are conserving without even realizing it.  Our appliances and gadgets are getting more and more efficient.  Replace your 15-20 year old refrigerator and you&#8217;ll get one the same size that uses 2x to 4x less electricity.  Replace your burned out incandescent light bulb and your options at the store will use 4x less electricity.</p>
<p>Then, for those few people who never close their refrigerator doors and have 12 big screen TVs going in every room &#8211; just charge a lot more for higher electricity use.  Tiered rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenwall Saxby</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenwall Saxby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like very much the point that was made here, law enforcement on energy consumption, it should be compulsory on all grid connected solar power homes to conserve energy, there nothing wrong with that, it a good thing to conserve energy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like very much the point that was made here, law enforcement on energy consumption, it should be compulsory on all grid connected solar power homes to conserve energy, there nothing wrong with that, it a good thing to conserve energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You nailed it, Bruce.


The folks who get their information from Rupert Murdoch (Fox, Wall Street Journal) or Malcolm Forbes&#039; bad seed are often badly misinformed.


It&#039;s like they&#039;re at 30,000 feet in a 747 and arguing that man will never fly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You nailed it, Bruce.</p>
<p>The folks who get their information from Rupert Murdoch (Fox, Wall Street Journal) or Malcolm Forbes&#8217; bad seed are often badly misinformed.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like they&#8217;re at 30,000 feet in a 747 and arguing that man will never fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very highly unlikely that we would send armed officers into your house to turn off your lights if you had too many on.


Usage will be controlled by rate schedules. 


Use a lot - pay a lot.



That extra payment will be used for more solar panels, wind turbines, other renewable generation and storage.


We&#039;re moving to a future where we will all be able to use as much power as we want (as long as we are willing to pay for it).  And all that electricity usage will not damage the planet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very highly unlikely that we would send armed officers into your house to turn off your lights if you had too many on.</p>
<p>Usage will be controlled by rate schedules. </p>
<p>Use a lot &#8211; pay a lot.</p>
<p>That extra payment will be used for more solar panels, wind turbines, other renewable generation and storage.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re moving to a future where we will all be able to use as much power as we want (as long as we are willing to pay for it).  And all that electricity usage will not damage the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;ve been surprised at how much wind and solar grids can accept with no disruption and without adding additional storage.  We used to think it would be under 20%, then studies moved the number to 40%.  Now we&#039;re seeing real world grids getting as much as 70% of their supply from renewables at time.

(That&#039;s not counting  several countries that have 90% - 100% renewable grids due to large amounts of hydro.)

--

Please link to some data on your claim about higher electricity usage resulting from grid-connected solar.



I don&#039;t find that credible and need to see some objective proof.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been surprised at how much wind and solar grids can accept with no disruption and without adding additional storage.  We used to think it would be under 20%, then studies moved the number to 40%.  Now we&#8217;re seeing real world grids getting as much as 70% of their supply from renewables at time.</p>
<p>(That&#8217;s not counting  several countries that have 90% &#8211; 100% renewable grids due to large amounts of hydro.)</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Please link to some data on your claim about higher electricity usage resulting from grid-connected solar.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t find that credible and need to see some objective proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, new wind generation is about the same cost as new natural gas generation.  Furthermore that wind cost is locked in for 20 to 40 years while the cost of natural gas is expected to increase.  And that&#039;s before we add carbon costs.


Coal is our most expensive way to generate electricity. While we pay small money at the meter, we pay large money via tax dollar and health insurance premiums.


New coal generation would be very much more expensive than wind, even before we add in the health costs.


You make a common mistake of assuming the variability  of wind makes it more expensive to the grid.  It doesn&#039;t. The cost of integrating wind into the overall mix is $0.0005/kWh.  Almost zero.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, new wind generation is about the same cost as new natural gas generation.  Furthermore that wind cost is locked in for 20 to 40 years while the cost of natural gas is expected to increase.  And that&#8217;s before we add carbon costs.</p>
<p>Coal is our most expensive way to generate electricity. While we pay small money at the meter, we pay large money via tax dollar and health insurance premiums.</p>
<p>New coal generation would be very much more expensive than wind, even before we add in the health costs.</p>
<p>You make a common mistake of assuming the variability  of wind makes it more expensive to the grid.  It doesn&#8217;t. The cost of integrating wind into the overall mix is $0.0005/kWh.  Almost zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we look at the places where wind and solar have been installed at the highest rates, places like Germany and Texas, things are going very well.


The grid has experienced no problems.  Integration costs have been extremely low.  The wholesale cost of electricity has dropped.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we look at the places where wind and solar have been installed at the highest rates, places like Germany and Texas, things are going very well.</p>
<p>The grid has experienced no problems.  Integration costs have been extremely low.  The wholesale cost of electricity has dropped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Morgan Williams</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Morgan Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It never ceases to amaze me that people are arguing that wind power is immature or uneconomic,  when it is already a huge and growing industry worldwide, and provides more than 25% of grid electricity in several states today.   As distributed generation,  demand side management, and grid scale storage all reach maturity,  the problem of intermittency will go away.   These technologies are all advancing by leaps and bounds, but you won&#039;t hear about it on Fox news, people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It never ceases to amaze me that people are arguing that wind power is immature or uneconomic,  when it is already a huge and growing industry worldwide, and provides more than 25% of grid electricity in several states today.   As distributed generation,  demand side management, and grid scale storage all reach maturity,  the problem of intermittency will go away.   These technologies are all advancing by leaps and bounds, but you won&#8217;t hear about it on Fox news, people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Deans 2013</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Deans 2013]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not without energy storage and law enforcement on energy amount used can this be achieved, otherwise where back where we started, producing more CO2 base emissions. There has to be law enforcement imposed upon energy used, to conserve energy, and not use more than previously, without any regard for the environment. Wind and solar power should not give one, the-right-off-way, to consume more energy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not without energy storage and law enforcement on energy amount used can this be achieved, otherwise where back where we started, producing more CO2 base emissions. There has to be law enforcement imposed upon energy used, to conserve energy, and not use more than previously, without any regard for the environment. Wind and solar power should not give one, the-right-off-way, to consume more energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your right no one will paid more of an idea that not proven .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your right no one will paid more of an idea that not proven .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim-tim</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/05/03/wisconsin-coal-dependency-could-cost-state-in-long-run/#comment-160345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim-tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 14:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=51271#comment-160345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No i don&#039;t agree with that.


Large-scale investment in wind and solar is as yet to be proven itself it hasn’t got supply storage capability other than those independent off grid systems that are remotely set up around the world.

If you put this into context this is a total failure is does not delivering energy on demand on a 24 hour basis when compared to a remote setup system which does supply 24-hour base load energy to the individual remote off grid set up solar or wind system. 

Grid connected solar power system has turned the system upside down the majority of houses are not conserving power but using more energy than previously after subsidies were issued for the solar grid system. 

We can’s compare those remote set up systems which are manage their own energy use and compare it with those which are dependent upon the grid connected solar power which are heavily subsidised.  Making the comparison that those on grid connected solar systems and not conserving power, are using more energy than before, at the expense of increasing amounts of CO2 emission. While those which have the remote off grid set up system conserve energy, and are CO2 emission neutral.

 So why are those people on grid connected solar system using more energy then before? It’s because no law enforcement has been imposed on them to conserve energy, and I think this is something that we have to look at more closely, should they be punished for using power after hours, should they be heavily  punished for exceeding energy consumption, in my opinion yes, because we cannot allow people to continue to use solar power as an excuse to use more energy, use more energy at night- day time period then they previously used while increasing there CO2 emission base loading it’s totally wrong .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No i don&#8217;t agree with that.</p>
<p>Large-scale investment in wind and solar is as yet to be proven itself it hasn’t got supply storage capability other than those independent off grid systems that are remotely set up around the world.</p>
<p>If you put this into context this is a total failure is does not delivering energy on demand on a 24 hour basis when compared to a remote setup system which does supply 24-hour base load energy to the individual remote off grid set up solar or wind system. </p>
<p>Grid connected solar power system has turned the system upside down the majority of houses are not conserving power but using more energy than previously after subsidies were issued for the solar grid system. </p>
<p>We can’s compare those remote set up systems which are manage their own energy use and compare it with those which are dependent upon the grid connected solar power which are heavily subsidised.  Making the comparison that those on grid connected solar systems and not conserving power, are using more energy than before, at the expense of increasing amounts of CO2 emission. While those which have the remote off grid set up system conserve energy, and are CO2 emission neutral.</p>
<p> So why are those people on grid connected solar system using more energy then before? It’s because no law enforcement has been imposed on them to conserve energy, and I think this is something that we have to look at more closely, should they be punished for using power after hours, should they be heavily  punished for exceeding energy consumption, in my opinion yes, because we cannot allow people to continue to use solar power as an excuse to use more energy, use more energy at night- day time period then they previously used while increasing there CO2 emission base loading it’s totally wrong .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
