<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 400 MW Solar Power Park Approved For Construction On Remote Japanese Island</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/05/400-mw-solar-power-park-approved-for-construction-on-remote-japanese-island/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/05/400-mw-solar-power-park-approved-for-construction-on-remote-japanese-island/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Brakels</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/05/400-mw-solar-power-park-approved-for-construction-on-remote-japanese-island/#comment-157331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Brakels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 02:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50437#comment-157331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, $2.50 a watt, but still good for Japan.  Their solar installation costs are obviously falling rapidly, as would be expected since they&#039;re following in the footsteps of Germany and other nations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, $2.50 a watt, but still good for Japan.  Their solar installation costs are obviously falling rapidly, as would be expected since they&#8217;re following in the footsteps of Germany and other nations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apostasyusa</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/05/400-mw-solar-power-park-approved-for-construction-on-remote-japanese-island/#comment-157296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apostasyusa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50437#comment-157296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that comes in about $2 per watt installed. that&#039;s a great price!

Lets see, $.39 per kW = $390 per megawatt, times 400 megawatts, times 5 hours a day, times 350 days a year = about $270 million a year in revenue.  This system pays for it self in less then 6 years at current feed in tariff rates (which are sure to drop again).

A great investment!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that comes in about $2 per watt installed. that&#8217;s a great price!</p>
<p>Lets see, $.39 per kW = $390 per megawatt, times 400 megawatts, times 5 hours a day, times 350 days a year = about $270 million a year in revenue.  This system pays for it self in less then 6 years at current feed in tariff rates (which are sure to drop again).</p>
<p>A great investment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
