<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mid-Level Carbon Price Could Result In 100% Renewable Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/03/mid-level-carbon-price-could-result-in-100-renewable-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/03/mid-level-carbon-price-could-result-in-100-renewable-energy/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis11</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/03/mid-level-carbon-price-could-result-in-100-renewable-energy/#comment-157259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Otis11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50385#comment-157259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So establish a clause that causes the Carbon tax to grow 5% faster than inflation. While it will take a few years for it to reach the $75 price level than guarantees 100% renewables, we need that time to actually deploy all of those renewables. Also, with a stable, predictable policy businesses will be more inclined to consider this as they look forward rather than immediately trying to get it repealed (such as what happens when sudden transitions make billion dollar investments unprofitable). There&#039;s still going to be resistance, but not nearly as much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So establish a clause that causes the Carbon tax to grow 5% faster than inflation. While it will take a few years for it to reach the $75 price level than guarantees 100% renewables, we need that time to actually deploy all of those renewables. Also, with a stable, predictable policy businesses will be more inclined to consider this as they look forward rather than immediately trying to get it repealed (such as what happens when sudden transitions make billion dollar investments unprofitable). There&#8217;s still going to be resistance, but not nearly as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Brakels</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/03/mid-level-carbon-price-could-result-in-100-renewable-energy/#comment-157124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Brakels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 05:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50385#comment-157124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Per tonne of carbon dioxide.  Nowadays carbon prices always refer to carbon dioxide.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per tonne of carbon dioxide.  Nowadays carbon prices always refer to carbon dioxide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoof hearted</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/03/mid-level-carbon-price-could-result-in-100-renewable-energy/#comment-157109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hoof hearted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50385#comment-157109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By $50-$100 per tonne of &quot;carbon&quot; does the author mean tonne of carbon or tonne of carbon dioxide?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By $50-$100 per tonne of &#8220;carbon&#8221; does the author mean tonne of carbon or tonne of carbon dioxide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
