<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: International Monetary Fund: US Is #1 Fossil Fuel Subsidizer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/02/international-monetary-fund-us-is-1-fossil-fuel-subsidizer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/02/international-monetary-fund-us-is-1-fossil-fuel-subsidizer/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron_Steenblik</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/02/international-monetary-fund-us-is-1-fossil-fuel-subsidizer/#comment-157055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron_Steenblik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50342#comment-157055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jeff Spross

I&#039;d be curious to know where you get the figures to say that &quot;most of the problem -- a little over US$ 1 trillion -- is the failure to properly price carbon pollution.&quot; 

If you look at Appendix Table 1, you will see that the IMF&#039;s reference Pigouvian tax is comprised of a whole lot of other externalities, including even traffic congestion (a problem that is not efficiently addressed through a tax on fuel, as congestion varies over time, and even electric vehicles contribute to it). In the case of transport fuels, their carbon tax component accounts for at most 1/6 of their optimal tax. Note in the discussion of coal, local pollutants also weigh heavily in their accounting for externalities.

So a more accurate description would be &quot;most of the problem -- a little over US$ 1 trillion -- is the failure to properly price externalities associated with fossil-fuel combustion and the operation of motorized vehicles.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeff Spross</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious to know where you get the figures to say that &#8220;most of the problem &#8212; a little over US$ 1 trillion &#8212; is the failure to properly price carbon pollution.&#8221; </p>
<p>If you look at Appendix Table 1, you will see that the IMF&#8217;s reference Pigouvian tax is comprised of a whole lot of other externalities, including even traffic congestion (a problem that is not efficiently addressed through a tax on fuel, as congestion varies over time, and even electric vehicles contribute to it). In the case of transport fuels, their carbon tax component accounts for at most 1/6 of their optimal tax. Note in the discussion of coal, local pollutants also weigh heavily in their accounting for externalities.</p>
<p>So a more accurate description would be &#8220;most of the problem &#8212; a little over US$ 1 trillion &#8212; is the failure to properly price externalities associated with fossil-fuel combustion and the operation of motorized vehicles.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agelbert</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/02/international-monetary-fund-us-is-1-fossil-fuel-subsidizer/#comment-157019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[agelbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50342#comment-157019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fossil fuels are killing us in so many ways it is ridiculous. I&#039;m glad more studies are pointing to this horror so we can end this insanity soon. Oh well, the Leaf had a record month in March sales so the revolution is gathering inertia.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fossil fuels are killing us in so many ways it is ridiculous. I&#8217;m glad more studies are pointing to this horror so we can end this insanity soon. Oh well, the Leaf had a record month in March sales so the revolution is gathering inertia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
