<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Subaru&#8217;s 1st Hybrid, But Not The Greenest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/01/subarus-1st-hybrid-but-not-the-greenest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/01/subarus-1st-hybrid-but-not-the-greenest/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/01/subarus-1st-hybrid-but-not-the-greenest/#comment-157752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50289#comment-157752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definitely. Didn&#039;t realize Subaru was such a loser in this space.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely. Didn&#8217;t realize Subaru was such a loser in this space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disappointed</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/01/subarus-1st-hybrid-but-not-the-greenest/#comment-157476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Disappointed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50289#comment-157476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definitely a disappointment. It would have been different if this mild hybrid was released a decade ago but at this point it&#039;s pretty unimpressive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely a disappointment. It would have been different if this mild hybrid was released a decade ago but at this point it&#8217;s pretty unimpressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPJFB</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/01/subarus-1st-hybrid-but-not-the-greenest/#comment-156899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPJFB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 09:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50289#comment-156899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, what would an equivalent Li-Ion battery pack do, comparatively?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what would an equivalent Li-Ion battery pack do, comparatively?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonesey jonesey</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/04/01/subarus-1st-hybrid-but-not-the-greenest/#comment-156879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonesey jonesey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 04:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50289#comment-156879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Subaru has not been a green carmaker for many, many years. They long ago decided to appeal to those who like the outdoorsy image but don&#039;t care about actual green features. They turned their relatively green station wagons into burly, elevated quasi-SUVs, all of which, including this hybrid, have had poor fuel economy.


They abandoned the green market segment and have yet to return to it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subaru has not been a green carmaker for many, many years. They long ago decided to appeal to those who like the outdoorsy image but don&#8217;t care about actual green features. They turned their relatively green station wagons into burly, elevated quasi-SUVs, all of which, including this hybrid, have had poor fuel economy.</p>
<p>They abandoned the green market segment and have yet to return to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
