<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Epic EV Throwing Launch Party For Torq Sports Car</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/26/epic-ev-throws-launch-party-for-torq-sports-car/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/26/epic-ev-throws-launch-party-for-torq-sports-car/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 03:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1st Epic EV Torq Goes To Ex-Tesla Exec &#124; CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/26/epic-ev-throws-launch-party-for-torq-sports-car/#comment-159074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1st Epic EV Torq Goes To Ex-Tesla Exec &#124; CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 10:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50005#comment-159074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] EV just recently threw a launch party for the Torq. The Torq is technically street legal, but I think you can tell from the pictures that it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] EV just recently threw a launch party for the Torq. The Torq is technically street legal, but I think you can tell from the pictures that it&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis11</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/26/epic-ev-throws-launch-party-for-torq-sports-car/#comment-156261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Otis11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=50005#comment-156261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;0.3 seconds faster...Would you notice the difference?&quot;

Between 7.7 and 8 seconds 0-60? Probably not

Between 3.7 and 4.0 seconds 0-60? Yeah! 

Regardless, I&#039;d still rather get the Model S Sport with 0-60 in 4.4 and drive it daily rather than a &quot;toy&quot; like this that&#039;s time is 4.0 but rarely drive... even if it would be twice as expensive, it replaces another whole car!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;0.3 seconds faster&#8230;Would you notice the difference?&#8221;</p>
<p>Between 7.7 and 8 seconds 0-60? Probably not</p>
<p>Between 3.7 and 4.0 seconds 0-60? Yeah! </p>
<p>Regardless, I&#8217;d still rather get the Model S Sport with 0-60 in 4.4 and drive it daily rather than a &#8220;toy&#8221; like this that&#8217;s time is 4.0 but rarely drive&#8230; even if it would be twice as expensive, it replaces another whole car!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
