<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strict Fuel Economy Standards Placed On Chinese Auto Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/22/strict-fuel-economy-standards-placed-on-chinese-auto-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/22/strict-fuel-economy-standards-placed-on-chinese-auto-industry/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Brakels</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/22/strict-fuel-economy-standards-placed-on-chinese-auto-industry/#comment-155791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Brakels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49924#comment-155791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally I&#039;ve been jonesing for improved Chinese efficiency standards for a long time.  Where China goes, others will follow.  EU standards have helped improve fuel efficiency in my country and China&#039;s improved standards will do the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;ve been jonesing for improved Chinese efficiency standards for a long time.  Where China goes, others will follow.  EU standards have helped improve fuel efficiency in my country and China&#8217;s improved standards will do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonesey jonesey</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/22/strict-fuel-economy-standards-placed-on-chinese-auto-industry/#comment-155776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonesey jonesey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49924#comment-155776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Long-awaited&quot;? &quot;Finally&quot;? China has had better fuel economy standards than the US for many years. 

Here&#039;s a familiar person showing a graph in a screen shot from a film that we&#039;ve all seen.

http://web.ncf.ca/jim/ref/inconvenientTruth/full/01_21_22.jpg

The US 2012 CAFE standard set a goal of 54 MPG by 2025. We might just catch up to China.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Long-awaited&#8221;? &#8220;Finally&#8221;? China has had better fuel economy standards than the US for many years. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a familiar person showing a graph in a screen shot from a film that we&#8217;ve all seen.</p>
<p><a href="http://web.ncf.ca/jim/ref/inconvenientTruth/full/01_21_22.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://web.ncf.ca/jim/ref/inconvenientTruth/full/01_21_22.jpg</a></p>
<p>The US 2012 CAFE standard set a goal of 54 MPG by 2025. We might just catch up to China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustSaying</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/22/strict-fuel-economy-standards-placed-on-chinese-auto-industry/#comment-155743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustSaying]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49924#comment-155743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now they need to move to low sulfur diesel like Europe/US/elsewhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now they need to move to low sulfur diesel like Europe/US/elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anderlan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/22/strict-fuel-economy-standards-placed-on-chinese-auto-industry/#comment-155740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anderlan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49924#comment-155740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7.8L/100km = 30MPG (current average)
6.9L/100km = 34MPG (2015 goal)
5L/100km = 47MPG (2020 goal)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7.8L/100km = 30MPG (current average)<br />
6.9L/100km = 34MPG (2015 goal)<br />
5L/100km = 47MPG (2020 goal)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
