<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wiki-Solar Ranks Top Solar Developers, First Solar On Top</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/20/wiki-solar-ranks-top-solar-manufacturers-first-solar-on-top/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/20/wiki-solar-ranks-top-solar-manufacturers-first-solar-on-top/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 10:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Solar -- #1 Solar Developer, #2 Solar Module Manufacturer −Solar Love!</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/20/wiki-solar-ranks-top-solar-manufacturers-first-solar-on-top/#comment-155751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[First Solar -- #1 Solar Developer, #2 Solar Module Manufacturer −Solar Love!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49822#comment-155751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] First Solar&#8217;s supremacy on this list, CleanTechnica&#8216;s Joshua Hill this week reported: &#8220;At the top of the list, with a total of 759 MW across 11 sites is First Solar, which [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] First Solar&#8217;s supremacy on this list, CleanTechnica&#8216;s Joshua Hill this week reported: &#8220;At the top of the list, with a total of 759 MW across 11 sites is First Solar, which [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
