<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Milestone For Cape Wind, The First U.S. Offshore Wind Farm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/20/first-us-offshore-wind-farm-cape-wind-nears-construction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/20/first-us-offshore-wind-farm-cape-wind-nears-construction/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 08:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senlac</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/20/first-us-offshore-wind-farm-cape-wind-nears-construction/#comment-215182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senlac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49819#comment-215182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good question. The silver lning here is that Wind Technology has greatly improved over the decade. The costs are lower and turbines are much better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good question. The silver lning here is that Wind Technology has greatly improved over the decade. The costs are lower and turbines are much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Diego Loves Green &#8211; Another Milestone For Cape Wind, The First U.S. Offshore Wind Farm</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/20/first-us-offshore-wind-farm-cape-wind-nears-construction/#comment-155483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[San Diego Loves Green &#8211; Another Milestone For Cape Wind, The First U.S. Offshore Wind Farm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49819#comment-155483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Casey had this article published on Clean Technica on March 20, 2013; image credit Cape Wind site plan courtesy of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Casey had this article published on Clean Technica on March 20, 2013; image credit Cape Wind site plan courtesy of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Devereaux</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/20/first-us-offshore-wind-farm-cape-wind-nears-construction/#comment-155461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Devereaux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49819#comment-155461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know if Cape Wind has updated their expected Generator adoption and design? My understanding is the project was originally spec&#039;d old design generators and out of line power costs. Can this be updated without resetting the whole project from an approval standpoint?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know if Cape Wind has updated their expected Generator adoption and design? My understanding is the project was originally spec&#8217;d old design generators and out of line power costs. Can this be updated without resetting the whole project from an approval standpoint?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
