Comments on: Walney Offshore Wind Farm To Triple In Size

By: Erika Tate

Erika Tate — Sun, 17 Mar 2013 23:52:00 +0000

If you think Lois`s story is surprising,, last pay-cheque mom in-law
actually earned $4738 working sixteen hours a week in their apartment
and their roomate’s step-mother`s neighbour done this for 5 months and
actually earnt over $4738 parttime at their pc. the steps on this
link… jump15.comCHECK IT OUT

By: Matthew Todd Peffly

Matthew Todd Peffly — Sun, 17 Mar 2013 03:39:00 +0000

Now the sad part. They are asking to add turbines to a site already approved (or close enough to be called the same site), but it will still take 18-24 months to approval. Environmental impact was cover for first 102 turbines. But still a lot faster than 10+ years for the Cap off shore wind farm (boy is my face red).

By: Zachary Shahan

Zachary Shahan — Sun, 17 Mar 2013 01:28:00 +0000

Thanks. Same here. (And also wish we didn’t make mistakes, but this is life….)

By: Bannor99

Bannor99 — Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:20:00 +0000

Thanks. Would that more bloggers were as responsive or willing to correct even minor mistakes.

By: Zachary Shahan

Zachary Shahan — Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:35:00 +0000

Corrections made.

By: Bannor99

Bannor99 — Sat, 16 Mar 2013 21:57:00 +0000

My thought exactly. Another mistake is where the article states that it was the largest wind farm in the world, neglecting to specify OFFSHORE as there are dozens of onshore farms that are larger, some that are 2-3x the nameplate capacity.

By: Cameron Phillips

Cameron Phillips — Sat, 16 Mar 2013 20:27:00 +0000

Seems like a strange title. Why not just say that it is tripling in size? After all: 367 * 3 = 1101