<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Scientists Plan To Recycle Power Plant Emissions Into Fuel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/11/uk-scientists-plan-to-recycle-power-plant-emissions-into-fuel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/11/uk-scientists-plan-to-recycle-power-plant-emissions-into-fuel/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 08:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis11</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/11/uk-scientists-plan-to-recycle-power-plant-emissions-into-fuel/#comment-154453</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Otis11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49347#comment-154453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That BBC article linked is some MAJOR GREEN WASHING.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That BBC article linked is some MAJOR GREEN WASHING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis11</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/11/uk-scientists-plan-to-recycle-power-plant-emissions-into-fuel/#comment-154451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Otis11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49347#comment-154451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While this may be a practical stop-gap solution, unless they plan on using GHGs already in the environment it is not a practical long term solution as the GHG is still emitted at the end.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this may be a practical stop-gap solution, unless they plan on using GHGs already in the environment it is not a practical long term solution as the GHG is still emitted at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/11/uk-scientists-plan-to-recycle-power-plant-emissions-into-fuel/#comment-154397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49347#comment-154397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops typo:

By the way: Biofuels are a very inefficient way to use solar energy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops typo:</p>
<p>By the way: Biofuels are a very inefficient way to use solar energy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/11/uk-scientists-plan-to-recycle-power-plant-emissions-into-fuel/#comment-154396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49347#comment-154396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smells like windowdressing. The same algae could produce biofuels using CO2 from the air. 


By the biofuels are a very inefficient way to use solar energy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smells like windowdressing. The same algae could produce biofuels using CO2 from the air. </p>
<p>By the biofuels are a very inefficient way to use solar energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/11/uk-scientists-plan-to-recycle-power-plant-emissions-into-fuel/#comment-154373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49347#comment-154373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a new idea hope so its successful on future.But its really a strange and unbelievable idea. so i have no surety  that is it good or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a new idea hope so its successful on future.But its really a strange and unbelievable idea. so i have no surety  that is it good or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/11/uk-scientists-plan-to-recycle-power-plant-emissions-into-fuel/#comment-154374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49347#comment-154374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a new idea hope so its successful on future.But its really a 
strange and unbelievable idea. so i have no surety  that is it good or 
not.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://basis-metals.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Industrial Waste Recycling&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a new idea hope so its successful on future.But its really a<br />
strange and unbelievable idea. so i have no surety  that is it good or<br />
not.</p>
<p><a href="http://basis-metals.com/" rel="nofollow">Industrial Waste Recycling</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdavies</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/11/uk-scientists-plan-to-recycle-power-plant-emissions-into-fuel/#comment-154290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jdavies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49347#comment-154290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see this as very positive. This is still taking fossil carbon out of the ground and putting it into the carbon cycle, meaning an increase in carbon in the cycle. This is the opposite of what we need to be doing and not what I would hope &#039;promising&#039; new technologies would be aiming to accomplish.


It might displace some fossil fuel use, and so marginally slow the rate of increase of carbon into the cycle, but if it somehow makes all these old fossil fuel burners seem more viable, then it could have a net negative impact on our shift to renewables.


Get the power stations burning renewable fuels, then it will be something to get excited about!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see this as very positive. This is still taking fossil carbon out of the ground and putting it into the carbon cycle, meaning an increase in carbon in the cycle. This is the opposite of what we need to be doing and not what I would hope &#8216;promising&#8217; new technologies would be aiming to accomplish.</p>
<p>It might displace some fossil fuel use, and so marginally slow the rate of increase of carbon into the cycle, but if it somehow makes all these old fossil fuel burners seem more viable, then it could have a net negative impact on our shift to renewables.</p>
<p>Get the power stations burning renewable fuels, then it will be something to get excited about!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
