<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MIT&#8217;s &#8220;Artifical Leaf&#8221; For Solar Energy Storage &amp; Fuel Moves Forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/06/mits-artifical-leaf-for-solar-energy-storage-fuel-moves-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/06/mits-artifical-leaf-for-solar-energy-storage-fuel-moves-forward/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UKGary</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/06/mits-artifical-leaf-for-solar-energy-storage-fuel-moves-forward/#comment-153845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UKGary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49183#comment-153845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Separating electrolysis from the cell adds a step to the process and may in the future result in lower overall efficiency (this remains to be seen). I think therefore it is worth looking at both routes if you actually want hydrogen. 


Where you want electricity for static applications, I would suggest that overall system efficiency is likely to be better with PV/advanced batteries than with PV/Hydrogen from either route. Costs are reducing, and there is a strong likelihood that future advanced batteries (high cycle efficiency, robust, last for decades) will use low cost readily available metals such as lead, sodium and zinc rather than lithium or other more expensive materials.


One thing in favor of the direct hydrogen conversion is that potentially the system will in effect be water cooled - avoiding the high temperature penalty currently paid by conventional PV.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Separating electrolysis from the cell adds a step to the process and may in the future result in lower overall efficiency (this remains to be seen). I think therefore it is worth looking at both routes if you actually want hydrogen. </p>
<p>Where you want electricity for static applications, I would suggest that overall system efficiency is likely to be better with PV/advanced batteries than with PV/Hydrogen from either route. Costs are reducing, and there is a strong likelihood that future advanced batteries (high cycle efficiency, robust, last for decades) will use low cost readily available metals such as lead, sodium and zinc rather than lithium or other more expensive materials.</p>
<p>One thing in favor of the direct hydrogen conversion is that potentially the system will in effect be water cooled &#8211; avoiding the high temperature penalty currently paid by conventional PV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anderlan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/03/06/mits-artifical-leaf-for-solar-energy-storage-fuel-moves-forward/#comment-153843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anderlan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=49183#comment-153843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why expose the water to the light?  You&#039;d have to worry more about having perfectly uncontaminated water (that won&#039;t grow things when exposed to warmth and light).  I mean, if it&#039;s just a normal Si cell, simply install normal solar on the roof, and put electrodes (I guess which are composed of this catalyst) in a container of water in a closet, using power from the mains to make hydroge at the most opportune time (decided as normal by software based on a number of factors like the output of the roof array, the usage of the rest of the house, and the current cost and sale price of power).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why expose the water to the light?  You&#8217;d have to worry more about having perfectly uncontaminated water (that won&#8217;t grow things when exposed to warmth and light).  I mean, if it&#8217;s just a normal Si cell, simply install normal solar on the roof, and put electrodes (I guess which are composed of this catalyst) in a container of water in a closet, using power from the mains to make hydroge at the most opportune time (decided as normal by software based on a number of factors like the output of the roof array, the usage of the rest of the house, and the current cost and sale price of power).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
