<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study Finds Fuel Economy Standards Less Cost Effective Than Fuel Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/25/study-finds-fuel-economy-standards-more-cost-effective-than-fuel-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/25/study-finds-fuel-economy-standards-more-cost-effective-than-fuel-tax/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 16:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/25/study-finds-fuel-economy-standards-more-cost-effective-than-fuel-tax/#comment-152694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48785#comment-152694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haha, agreed!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, agreed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdavies</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/25/study-finds-fuel-economy-standards-more-cost-effective-than-fuel-tax/#comment-152683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jdavies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48785#comment-152683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d love to buy an electric car but can&#039;t afford to, so I instead bought a more efficient used car, and doubled my mpg! I&#039;m in the UK, but if taxes in whichever country encourage people to buy more efficient cars then we could make a big dent in emissions. Not to mention more conservative usage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to buy an electric car but can&#8217;t afford to, so I instead bought a more efficient used car, and doubled my mpg! I&#8217;m in the UK, but if taxes in whichever country encourage people to buy more efficient cars then we could make a big dent in emissions. Not to mention more conservative usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mk1313</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/25/study-finds-fuel-economy-standards-more-cost-effective-than-fuel-tax/#comment-152620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mk1313]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48785#comment-152620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So do both. Easy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do both. Easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/25/study-finds-fuel-economy-standards-more-cost-effective-than-fuel-tax/#comment-152587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48785#comment-152587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WTH? Thanks for the quick catch. Just updated... ugh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTH? Thanks for the quick catch. Just updated&#8230; ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/25/study-finds-fuel-economy-standards-more-cost-effective-than-fuel-tax/#comment-152517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48785#comment-152517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sad.  It looks like ~7 news groups forwarded this on, with the backwards headline!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad.  It looks like ~7 news groups forwarded this on, with the backwards headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Wright</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/02/25/study-finds-fuel-economy-standards-more-cost-effective-than-fuel-tax/#comment-152492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=48785#comment-152492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uh, guys, I think you need to adjust the title of this article !


It says the opposite of what the article itself says.. and the opposite of that which most of us have known for years... that taxes work better than fuel standards...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, guys, I think you need to adjust the title of this article !</p>
<p>It says the opposite of what the article itself says.. and the opposite of that which most of us have known for years&#8230; that taxes work better than fuel standards&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
