By: Kent Beuchert

Kent Beuchert — Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:29:00 +0000

After researching solar power for several years, largely as a result of a desire
to install a rooftop solar array, I have come to conclude that practically every benefit claimed for solar energy is an illusion, and its acceptance is based on either ignorance or outright propaganda by the solar industry and its paid supporters.
For example, on this website are claims of “X GW of solar power,” implying that
this is equivalent to a conventional power plant of X GW capacity. That is a
fraudulent claim in a number of ways. A solar farm with a claimed max power output of 1 GW will likely never produce more than 870 MW, and then only when the plant is new,and for a few minutes per day. A nuclear power plant rated at 1600 MW can produce well above that amount for 24 hours per day, at less than half the cost and well below half the carbon emissions generated by the solar panels. A typical Gen 3 nuclear plant would be equivalent to over 10,000 MW of solar power. And it gets much worse – solar energy is harvested when the sun shines, not normally when the demand is greatest. It requires total backup by conventional power generators, which adds enormously to the hidden, side-effect costs of solar, as do the heavy government subsidies. Land use is another negative for solar power,except of rooftop systems, but rooftop systems face another set of cost issues. Apparently, no one has realized that rooftops require re-shingling every 20 years or so.The major cost of a rooftop system is installation costs. Most solar roofs will have to be re-shingled before the solar panels lose most of their effectiveness, which means that most roof system costs will have to include two installations plus one de-installation during their lifespan, perhaps more. That fact totally invalidates any cost analysis that doesn’t take that major cost item into account. I have seen zero such cost analyses that do so – another solar illusion. Another is the wide discrepancy between rated power and actual power. delivered by such a system. By all rights,the court system should be clogged with class action lawsuits against solar providers for gross misrepresentations. Another solar illusion. Fortunately, there are states that
have pursued an emission-effective and cost effective strategy – South Carolina
will build three new nuclear reactors and achieve 86% emission-free power
and not rape the landscape in the process, and their cost of power is already 40% less than California’s, which must import 25% of its power (South Carolina,
on the other hand, is able to export 20% of its power). And California’s new pumped storage .facilities cost almost as much as an equivalently rated nuclear power plant. They can store only 10 to 15 hours worth of power. They add yet another side effect cost to the already high cost of solar and wind. Another illusion of renewable power. And with Gen 4 nuclear plants online, our “nuclear wastes” can be burned to produce all the power this country needs for the next 1000 years. We have no energy crisis – only a deficit of intelligence. Renewable power such as solar and wind, is simply an environmentally irresponsible and expensive energy strategy. Nor is it as safe as nuclear. How many deaths and injuries will occur when installers fall off one of those “one million” new rooftop solar installations (actually two million)? , In 60 years of nuclear power, no one has been killed as a result of nuclear power in the Western world. Solar power claims of increased safety? Another illusion.

By: anderlan

anderlan — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:55:00 +0000

If total worldwide solar installation is ~100GWp, then 90% is decentralized!

Comments on: Giant Solar Farm Capacity Doubling Inside 12 Months, Breaking 12 GW

By: Kent Beuchert

By: anderlan