<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super-Efficient Solar Cells Possible Through Use Of Exotic Form Of Silicon, Generating More Than One Electron-Hole Pair Per Photon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/30/super-efficient-solar-cells-possible-through-use-of-exotic-form-of-silicon-generating-more-than-one-electron-hole-pair-per-photon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/30/super-efficient-solar-cells-possible-through-use-of-exotic-form-of-silicon-generating-more-than-one-electron-hole-pair-per-photon/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 17:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mds</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/30/super-efficient-solar-cells-possible-through-use-of-exotic-form-of-silicon-generating-more-than-one-electron-hole-pair-per-photon/#comment-149628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47786#comment-149628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting, but you&#039;re going to have to explain how a concentrator can increase efficiency of conversion.  Normally, for CPV, efficiency is measured as a percentage of the light collection area, so the concentrator allows less PV material to be used to convert sunlight from a larger area, but it does not increase the efficiency of conversion.  In fact, the reflectors or lenses used cannot be perfect (that&#039;s life), so CPV typically has a few percentage points LESS efficiency than the PV cells used.
Increasing efficiency from 42% to 70% by using a concentrator is either:
(a) a mis-quote
(b) what he&#039;s saying is not properly explained
or (c) it&#039;s nonsense.
{I mean no offense here.  I hope you will forgive me for being blunt and to the point.  I appreciate the article.  This is really amazing solar science.  I&#039;m just trying to improve understanding, maybe just mine, by pointing out an apparent flaw in the information given.}
Thanks,
mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, but you&#8217;re going to have to explain how a concentrator can increase efficiency of conversion.  Normally, for CPV, efficiency is measured as a percentage of the light collection area, so the concentrator allows less PV material to be used to convert sunlight from a larger area, but it does not increase the efficiency of conversion.  In fact, the reflectors or lenses used cannot be perfect (that&#8217;s life), so CPV typically has a few percentage points LESS efficiency than the PV cells used.<br />
Increasing efficiency from 42% to 70% by using a concentrator is either:<br />
(a) a mis-quote<br />
(b) what he&#8217;s saying is not properly explained<br />
or (c) it&#8217;s nonsense.<br />
{I mean no offense here.  I hope you will forgive me for being blunt and to the point.  I appreciate the article.  This is really amazing solar science.  I&#8217;m just trying to improve understanding, maybe just mine, by pointing out an apparent flaw in the information given.}<br />
Thanks,<br />
mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis11</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/30/super-efficient-solar-cells-possible-through-use-of-exotic-form-of-silicon-generating-more-than-one-electron-hole-pair-per-photon/#comment-149207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Otis11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47786#comment-149207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And there&#039;s always the fact that until energy is to cheap to care (which I don&#039;t see on the horizon) people/organizations/companies will continue to research technologies to make even the &quot;out there&quot; concepts of today a reality in a few decades, if not sooner.

Interesting piece!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And there&#8217;s always the fact that until energy is to cheap to care (which I don&#8217;t see on the horizon) people/organizations/companies will continue to research technologies to make even the &#8220;out there&#8221; concepts of today a reality in a few decades, if not sooner.</p>
<p>Interesting piece!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sola</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/30/super-efficient-solar-cells-possible-through-use-of-exotic-form-of-silicon-generating-more-than-one-electron-hole-pair-per-photon/#comment-149197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47786#comment-149197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That 70% efficiency would make  concentrating systems really worth it.


Of course, it is still a question of economics but the method may not raise prices significantly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 70% efficiency would make  concentrating systems really worth it.</p>
<p>Of course, it is still a question of economics but the method may not raise prices significantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
