<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New &#8220;Rock Candy&#8221; Silicon Could Make Ultra-Cheap Solar Power Even Cheaper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/25/cheap-solar-power-could-result-from-new-silicon-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/25/cheap-solar-power-could-result-from-new-silicon-process/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andres roy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/25/cheap-solar-power-could-result-from-new-silicon-process/#comment-155913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andres roy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47604#comment-155913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved reading this piece! Well written!

Merlen Hogg
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.th-service.no/om-oss/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;isolering&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved reading this piece! Well written!</p>
<p>Merlen Hogg<br />
<a href="http://www.th-service.no/om-oss/" rel="nofollow">isolering</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merlen hogg</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/25/cheap-solar-power-could-result-from-new-silicon-process/#comment-155074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[merlen hogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47604#comment-155074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved reading this piece! Well written!

Merlen Hogg
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.th-service.no/samarbeidspartnere/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;flexiskumm&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved reading this piece! Well written!</p>
<p>Merlen Hogg<br />
<a href="http://www.th-service.no/samarbeidspartnere/" rel="nofollow">flexiskumm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/25/cheap-solar-power-could-result-from-new-silicon-process/#comment-148907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47604#comment-148907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Silicon tetrachloride does not appear in nature, so it has to be made from siliconoxide. How is the energy footprint of this process compared to the standard way to produce silicon directly? Without answering this question we are still in the dark about the benefits of the new process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silicon tetrachloride does not appear in nature, so it has to be made from siliconoxide. How is the energy footprint of this process compared to the standard way to produce silicon directly? Without answering this question we are still in the dark about the benefits of the new process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/25/cheap-solar-power-could-result-from-new-silicon-process/#comment-148464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Blanchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47604#comment-148464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My mistake - I was confused by the &quot;8 cents kWh&quot; because that would need a period of time to be meaningful.  If you buy panels for a certain cost, and you say they cost X per kWh, you also have to say how long a period of time it takes to get to that number.

Neil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mistake &#8211; I was confused by the &#8220;8 cents kWh&#8221; because that would need a period of time to be meaningful.  If you buy panels for a certain cost, and you say they cost X per kWh, you also have to say how long a period of time it takes to get to that number.</p>
<p>Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/25/cheap-solar-power-could-result-from-new-silicon-process/#comment-148347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47604#comment-148347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$2/watt installed in most parts of the US would give us roughly 8 cent per kWh electricity.  No subsidies included.


Germany is installing for $2/watt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$2/watt installed in most parts of the US would give us roughly 8 cent per kWh electricity.  No subsidies included.</p>
<p>Germany is installing for $2/watt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/25/cheap-solar-power-could-result-from-new-silicon-process/#comment-148346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47604#comment-148346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Were did the &quot;8 cents/kW&quot; come from?

--

Right now the cost of silicon cells is running about 35 cents per watt.  Dropping the price of silicon will help, but that&#039;s not where the expense is with solar.  US solar is averaging around $3.50 watt while panels are averaging about 63 cents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were did the &#8220;8 cents/kW&#8221; come from?</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Right now the cost of silicon cells is running about 35 cents per watt.  Dropping the price of silicon will help, but that&#8217;s not where the expense is with solar.  US solar is averaging around $3.50 watt while panels are averaging about 63 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Card</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/25/cheap-solar-power-could-result-from-new-silicon-process/#comment-148332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Card]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47604#comment-148332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[panels are 80 to 150 cents per watt delivered (not installed)  8 cents / kW would refer to the cost of elec generated by a system.  You may of course have meant that.  the key is that 8 cents would eliminate the need for susidies and make solar competetive with utility provided power anywhere in the southwest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>panels are 80 to 150 cents per watt delivered (not installed)  8 cents / kW would refer to the cost of elec generated by a system.  You may of course have meant that.  the key is that 8 cents would eliminate the need for susidies and make solar competetive with utility provided power anywhere in the southwest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sola</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/25/cheap-solar-power-could-result-from-new-silicon-process/#comment-148310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47604#comment-148310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[8c/KW would be nice :) but I think we would be happy with 8c/W too.


In this price range non-silicon material prices would start limiting further cost reductions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8c/KW would be nice <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> but I think we would be happy with 8c/W too.</p>
<p>In this price range non-silicon material prices would start limiting further cost reductions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/25/cheap-solar-power-could-result-from-new-silicon-process/#comment-148274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Blanchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47604#comment-148274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, if this reduces the 8 cents/kW panels, then it is truly revolutionary!

Neil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, if this reduces the 8 cents/kW panels, then it is truly revolutionary!</p>
<p>Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
