<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China Targeting 10 GW of New Solar Capacity In 2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/16/china-targeting-10-gw-of-new-solar-capacity-in-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/16/china-targeting-10-gw-of-new-solar-capacity-in-2013/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Todd Peffly</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/16/china-targeting-10-gw-of-new-solar-capacity-in-2013/#comment-147329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Todd Peffly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47239#comment-147329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7GWs end of 2012, adding 10GWs in 2013. 17GWs end of 2013.
Cutting back in 14/15? They should pass 25 in 2014 at current rate. But maybe plan is they go back to mostly export in 14/15]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7GWs end of 2012, adding 10GWs in 2013. 17GWs end of 2013.<br />
Cutting back in 14/15? They should pass 25 in 2014 at current rate. But maybe plan is they go back to mostly export in 14/15</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jburt56</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/16/china-targeting-10-gw-of-new-solar-capacity-in-2013/#comment-147306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jburt56]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=47239#comment-147306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should be more like 100 GW per year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should be more like 100 GW per year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
