<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Utilizing Human Fascination With Speed, China Pushing Technological Limits Of High-Speed Rail At -40° Fahrenheit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/03/utilizing-human-fascination-with-speed-china-pushing-technological-limits-of-high-speed-rail-at-40-fahrenheit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/03/utilizing-human-fascination-with-speed-china-pushing-technological-limits-of-high-speed-rail-at-40-fahrenheit/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/03/utilizing-human-fascination-with-speed-china-pushing-technological-limits-of-high-speed-rail-at-40-fahrenheit/#comment-146036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 02:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46725#comment-146036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a ton of editing goes into our articles, but things slip. and they don&#039;t only slip here -- i see typos on every site i read, from the Guardian to HuffPo to the Washington Post -- shit happens.

as far as the image, the link directly before the image is about that &quot;innovation in technology.&quot; normally, i&#039;d make sure the link between the picture and text was more obvious, but I was actually into the subtle way it was made in this case... so left it that way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a ton of editing goes into our articles, but things slip. and they don&#8217;t only slip here &#8212; i see typos on every site i read, from the Guardian to HuffPo to the Washington Post &#8212; shit happens.</p>
<p>as far as the image, the link directly before the image is about that &#8220;innovation in technology.&#8221; normally, i&#8217;d make sure the link between the picture and text was more obvious, but I was actually into the subtle way it was made in this case&#8230; so left it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/03/utilizing-human-fascination-with-speed-china-pushing-technological-limits-of-high-speed-rail-at-40-fahrenheit/#comment-146035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46725#comment-146035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, as soon as i left my last comment, i changed my mind and decided both was better. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, as soon as i left my last comment, i changed my mind and decided both was better. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare Nelson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/03/utilizing-human-fascination-with-speed-china-pushing-technological-limits-of-high-speed-rail-at-40-fahrenheit/#comment-145954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clare Nelson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46725#comment-145954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; they must operate a special breaking system&quot;
Really? What gets broken?


And why publish a picture with the mysterious caption &quot;Concept train transfer&quot; without mentioning it in the text?


I appreciate the information in most of these pieces, but a bit of editing would make them read more easily and look more professional.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; they must operate a special breaking system&#8221;<br />
Really? What gets broken?</p>
<p>And why publish a picture with the mysterious caption &#8220;Concept train transfer&#8221; without mentioning it in the text?</p>
<p>I appreciate the information in most of these pieces, but a bit of editing would make them read more easily and look more professional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Chandler</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/03/utilizing-human-fascination-with-speed-china-pushing-technological-limits-of-high-speed-rail-at-40-fahrenheit/#comment-145934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Chandler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46725#comment-145934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also refer to it by Celsius not Centigrade.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also refer to it by Celsius not Centigrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/03/utilizing-human-fascination-with-speed-china-pushing-technological-limits-of-high-speed-rail-at-40-fahrenheit/#comment-145912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 03:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46725#comment-145912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d vote for both.  Most of us in the US really can&#039;t relate to C.  We live in a land of F.

That may upset some, but that&#039;s reality and if maximum communication is the goal.

Besides, think of the energy saved if the author makes the conversion one time as opposed to all of us &quot;backward Americans&quot; separately putting electrons to work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d vote for both.  Most of us in the US really can&#8217;t relate to C.  We live in a land of F.</p>
<p>That may upset some, but that&#8217;s reality and if maximum communication is the goal.</p>
<p>Besides, think of the energy saved if the author makes the conversion one time as opposed to all of us &#8220;backward Americans&#8221; separately putting electrons to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/03/utilizing-human-fascination-with-speed-china-pushing-technological-limits-of-high-speed-rail-at-40-fahrenheit/#comment-145905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46725#comment-145905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha, well then... :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, well then&#8230; <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/03/utilizing-human-fascination-with-speed-china-pushing-technological-limits-of-high-speed-rail-at-40-fahrenheit/#comment-145904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46725#comment-145904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like a plan. Will do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a plan. Will do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/03/utilizing-human-fascination-with-speed-china-pushing-technological-limits-of-high-speed-rail-at-40-fahrenheit/#comment-145897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46725#comment-145897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just ditch Fahrenheit  you are posting on the internet, its not like there arent converters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just ditch Fahrenheit  you are posting on the internet, its not like there arent converters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar Fan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/03/utilizing-human-fascination-with-speed-china-pushing-technological-limits-of-high-speed-rail-at-40-fahrenheit/#comment-145875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solar Fan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46725#comment-145875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly, Neil.  Or... they could actually give the Fahrenheit AND Centigrade values every time.  You&#039;d think a site dedicated to SCIENCE would move into the 21st century already.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, Neil.  Or&#8230; they could actually give the Fahrenheit AND Centigrade values every time.  You&#8217;d think a site dedicated to SCIENCE would move into the 21st century already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2013/01/03/utilizing-human-fascination-with-speed-china-pushing-technological-limits-of-high-speed-rail-at-40-fahrenheit/#comment-145861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Blanchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46725#comment-145861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For what it&#039;s worth: -40°F = -40°C so you can just say -40°.  ;-)


Neil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth: -40°F = -40°C so you can just say -40°.  <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
