<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar Production Module Costs To Decline To As Low As $0.48/W Within Five Years: Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/18/solar-production-module-costs-to-decline-to-as-low-as-0-48w-within-five-years-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/18/solar-production-module-costs-to-decline-to-as-low-as-0-48w-within-five-years-report/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 03:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/18/solar-production-module-costs-to-decline-to-as-low-as-0-48w-within-five-years-report/#comment-144278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46288#comment-144278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Thomas.

News like this makes me feel like we have a decent chance of avoiding the worst of climate change.

If Germany could only package its BOS prices and ship them out to the rest of the world...

--

The fully automated factory producing at $0.48/w is likely to cause problems for Chinese manufacturers.  Their labor cost advantages are neutralized.  Cheaper to ship factories close to market than to ship a continuing stream of product.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Thomas.</p>
<p>News like this makes me feel like we have a decent chance of avoiding the worst of climate change.</p>
<p>If Germany could only package its BOS prices and ship them out to the rest of the world&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>The fully automated factory producing at $0.48/w is likely to cause problems for Chinese manufacturers.  Their labor cost advantages are neutralized.  Cheaper to ship factories close to market than to ship a continuing stream of product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThomasGerke</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/18/solar-production-module-costs-to-decline-to-as-low-as-0-48w-within-five-years-report/#comment-144270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThomasGerke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46288#comment-144270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year a solar factory-line manufacturer (German style ;) - don&#039;t build the stuff, build the factory that makes stuff) has presented their new CIGSfab fully automated production line....
The current 200MW version produces CIGS-Thin film panels for $0.55/Wp and the scaled up 1GW production line could achieve $0.48/Wp. 

If investment capital find its way, we could already be in 2017 next year ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year a solar factory-line manufacturer (German style <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" /> &#8211; don&#8217;t build the stuff, build the factory that makes stuff) has presented their new CIGSfab fully automated production line&#8230;.<br />
The current 200MW version produces CIGS-Thin film panels for $0.55/Wp and the scaled up 1GW production line could achieve $0.48/Wp. </p>
<p>If investment capital find its way, we could already be in 2017 next year <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/18/solar-production-module-costs-to-decline-to-as-low-as-0-48w-within-five-years-report/#comment-144237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=46288#comment-144237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;However, the report projected that Cadmium telluride (CdTe) modules would remain the least expensive option in the market for years to come, with prices reaching as low as $0.48/W by 2017.

Meanwhile, COGS all around is projected between 2012 through 2017, as copper indium gallium (di) selende thin-film modules decline to $0.64/W, a 14 cent price difference from today’s costs.&quot;

Silicon module prices last Wednesday were an average of $0.66/watt with a low of $0.54/watt.

Thin film was $0.62/watt average and $0.52/watt low.  Only four cents higher than as the minimum predicted.

Looks like 2017 is going to arrive fairly soon....

http://pvinsights.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, the report projected that Cadmium telluride (CdTe) modules would remain the least expensive option in the market for years to come, with prices reaching as low as $0.48/W by 2017.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, COGS all around is projected between 2012 through 2017, as copper indium gallium (di) selende thin-film modules decline to $0.64/W, a 14 cent price difference from today’s costs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Silicon module prices last Wednesday were an average of $0.66/watt with a low of $0.54/watt.</p>
<p>Thin film was $0.62/watt average and $0.52/watt low.  Only four cents higher than as the minimum predicted.</p>
<p>Looks like 2017 is going to arrive fairly soon&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://pvinsights.com/" rel="nofollow">http://pvinsights.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
