<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FirstEnergy Solutions &amp; PECO Offering 100% Renewable Electricity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/03/firstenergy-solutions-peco-offering-100-renewable-electricity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/03/firstenergy-solutions-peco-offering-100-renewable-electricity/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 04:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/12/03/firstenergy-solutions-peco-offering-100-renewable-electricity/#comment-142856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45698#comment-142856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since PECO operates in states where there are virtually no renewable power facilities...i.e. pennsylvania.....this sounds a little weird......and WHY is it a higher rate for the 2 year contract than for the 1 year? Who would want to actully pay more?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since PECO operates in states where there are virtually no renewable power facilities&#8230;i.e. pennsylvania&#8230;..this sounds a little weird&#8230;&#8230;and WHY is it a higher rate for the 2 year contract than for the 1 year? Who would want to actully pay more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
