<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy Storage Systems To Bring Baseload Renewable Energy, But Who Will Benefit? (+ New Energy Storage System From Australia)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/24/energy-storage-systems-to-bring-baseload-renewable-energy-but-who-will-benefit-new-energy-storage-system-from-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/24/energy-storage-systems-to-bring-baseload-renewable-energy-but-who-will-benefit-new-energy-storage-system-from-australia/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/24/energy-storage-systems-to-bring-baseload-renewable-energy-but-who-will-benefit-new-energy-storage-system-from-australia/#comment-142357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45406#comment-142357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the info -- looks awesome! :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info &#8212; looks awesome! <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giles</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/24/energy-storage-systems-to-bring-baseload-renewable-energy-but-who-will-benefit-new-energy-storage-system-from-australia/#comment-142224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[giles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45406#comment-142224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, night time or off-peak. In Australia, it&#039;s the same thing.

Pose the other questions back to the company. They said:

1) Cost per kWh at launch price of $29,500 for 20kWh’s = $1,485 however we expect to get this to $1,000 per kWh or below over the first 6-12 months once we commence mass production.

What cost needed for mass uptake?

The utilities have told us $1,000/kWh for their purposes so I would imagine that would also kick in a relatively high level of consumer demand.

 Mass market probably half that again…it want take long

2)      The battery data sheet at @ 70 Depth of Discharge = 3,000 cycles / At 80% = 2,000 cycles however with our patented Active Battery Management System we are expecting a much longer cycle life in both cases as the cells are managed and optimised individually, not as a bank which is what the data sheet relates to.

 The utilities have told us $1,000/kWh for their purposes so I would imagine that would also kick in a relatively high level of consumer demand.

 

Mass market probably half that again…it want take long]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, night time or off-peak. In Australia, it&#8217;s the same thing.</p>
<p>Pose the other questions back to the company. They said:</p>
<p>1) Cost per kWh at launch price of $29,500 for 20kWh’s = $1,485 however we expect to get this to $1,000 per kWh or below over the first 6-12 months once we commence mass production.</p>
<p>What cost needed for mass uptake?</p>
<p>The utilities have told us $1,000/kWh for their purposes so I would imagine that would also kick in a relatively high level of consumer demand.</p>
<p> Mass market probably half that again…it want take long</p>
<p>2)      The battery data sheet at @ 70 Depth of Discharge = 3,000 cycles / At 80% = 2,000 cycles however with our patented Active Battery Management System we are expecting a much longer cycle life in both cases as the cells are managed and optimised individually, not as a bank which is what the data sheet relates to.</p>
<p> The utilities have told us $1,000/kWh for their purposes so I would imagine that would also kick in a relatively high level of consumer demand.</p>
<p>Mass market probably half that again…it want take long</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mds</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/24/energy-storage-systems-to-bring-baseload-renewable-energy-but-who-will-benefit-new-energy-storage-system-from-australia/#comment-142070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45406#comment-142070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sorry, should  be: deep-cycle-life]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, should  be: deep-cycle-life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mds</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/24/energy-storage-systems-to-bring-baseload-renewable-energy-but-who-will-benefit-new-energy-storage-system-from-australia/#comment-142069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45406#comment-142069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giles,
&quot;7c/kWh at time&quot;  You  mean &quot;at off peak times&quot; or &quot;at night time&quot;?
What is cost per kWh of the storage?
What is expected deep-life-cycle?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giles,<br />
&#8220;7c/kWh at time&#8221;  You  mean &#8220;at off peak times&#8221; or &#8220;at night time&#8221;?<br />
What is cost per kWh of the storage?<br />
What is expected deep-life-cycle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/24/energy-storage-systems-to-bring-baseload-renewable-energy-but-who-will-benefit-new-energy-storage-system-from-australia/#comment-142055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45406#comment-142055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Agreed. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Agreed. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/24/energy-storage-systems-to-bring-baseload-renewable-energy-but-who-will-benefit-new-energy-storage-system-from-australia/#comment-141992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45406#comment-141992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great coverage, keep it coming, need to see more coverage of energy storage uses and applications.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great coverage, keep it coming, need to see more coverage of energy storage uses and applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
