<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grover Norquist Pulls A U-Turn On Carbon Tax After Koch-Backed Group&#8217;s Pressure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/15/grover-norquist-pulls-a-u-turn-on-carbon-tax-after-koch-backed-groups-pressure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/15/grover-norquist-pulls-a-u-turn-on-carbon-tax-after-koch-backed-groups-pressure/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Taylor</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/15/grover-norquist-pulls-a-u-turn-on-carbon-tax-after-koch-backed-groups-pressure/#comment-141407</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45117#comment-141407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob, thanks for that! Good information to have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, thanks for that! Good information to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/15/grover-norquist-pulls-a-u-turn-on-carbon-tax-after-koch-backed-groups-pressure/#comment-141275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45117#comment-141275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the question from the NYTimes White House reporter...

“Mr. President. In his endorsement of you a few weeks ago, Mayor Bloomberg said he was motivated by the belief that you would do more to confront the threat of climate change than your opponent. Tomorrow you’re going up to New York City, where you’re going to, I assume, see people who are still suffering the effects of Hurricane Sandy, which many people say is further evidence of how a warming globe is changing our weather. What specifically do you plan to do in a second term to tackle the issue of climate change? And do you think the political will exists in Washington to pass legislation that could include some kind of a tax on carbon?”

The president did not shy away from the question, saying, “I am a firm believer that climate change is real, that it is impacted by human behavior and carbon emissions.”

“You know, as you know, Mark, we can’t attribute any particular weather event to climate change. What we do know is the temperature around the globe is increasing faster than was predicted even 10 years ago. We do know that the Arctic ice cap is melting faster than was predicted even five years ago. We do know that there have been extraordinarily — there have been an extraordinarily large number of severe weather events here in North America, but also around the globe.”

“And I am a firm believer that climate change is real, that it is impacted by human behavior and carbon emissions. And as a consequence, I think we’ve got an obligation to future generations to do something about it.”

President Obama then talks about what was done in his first term to help curb carbon emissions, such as the new CAFE standards on cars and trucks, as well as clean energy productions.

“Now, in my first term, we doubled fuel efficiency standards on cars and trucks. That will have an impact. That will a lot of carbon out of the atmosphere. We doubled the production of clean energy, which promises to reduce the utilization of fossil fuels for power generation. And we continue to invest in potential breakthrough technologies that could further remove carbon from our atmosphere.”

“But we haven’t done as much as we need to. So what I’m going to be doing over the next several weeks, next several months, is having a conversation, a wide-ranging conversation with scientists, engineers and elected officials to find out what can — what more can we do to make short-term progress in reducing carbons, and then working through an education process that I think is necessary, a discussion, the conversation across the country about, you know, what realistically can we do long term to make sure that this is not something we’re passing on to future generations that’s going to be very expensive and very painful to deal with.”

President Obama said he did not know “what either Democrats or Republicans are prepared to do at this point because it is a “partisan” issue today, unlike the past when there was “bipartisan support.”

“So you know, you can expect that you’ll hear more from me in the coming months and years about how we can shape an agenda that garners bipartisan support and helps move this — moves this agenda forward.”

http://www.examiner.com/article/president-obama-i-am-a-firm-believer-that-climate-change-is-real]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the question from the NYTimes White House reporter&#8230;</p>
<p>“Mr. President. In his endorsement of you a few weeks ago, Mayor Bloomberg said he was motivated by the belief that you would do more to confront the threat of climate change than your opponent. Tomorrow you’re going up to New York City, where you’re going to, I assume, see people who are still suffering the effects of Hurricane Sandy, which many people say is further evidence of how a warming globe is changing our weather. What specifically do you plan to do in a second term to tackle the issue of climate change? And do you think the political will exists in Washington to pass legislation that could include some kind of a tax on carbon?”</p>
<p>The president did not shy away from the question, saying, “I am a firm believer that climate change is real, that it is impacted by human behavior and carbon emissions.”</p>
<p>“You know, as you know, Mark, we can’t attribute any particular weather event to climate change. What we do know is the temperature around the globe is increasing faster than was predicted even 10 years ago. We do know that the Arctic ice cap is melting faster than was predicted even five years ago. We do know that there have been extraordinarily — there have been an extraordinarily large number of severe weather events here in North America, but also around the globe.”</p>
<p>“And I am a firm believer that climate change is real, that it is impacted by human behavior and carbon emissions. And as a consequence, I think we’ve got an obligation to future generations to do something about it.”</p>
<p>President Obama then talks about what was done in his first term to help curb carbon emissions, such as the new CAFE standards on cars and trucks, as well as clean energy productions.</p>
<p>“Now, in my first term, we doubled fuel efficiency standards on cars and trucks. That will have an impact. That will a lot of carbon out of the atmosphere. We doubled the production of clean energy, which promises to reduce the utilization of fossil fuels for power generation. And we continue to invest in potential breakthrough technologies that could further remove carbon from our atmosphere.”</p>
<p>“But we haven’t done as much as we need to. So what I’m going to be doing over the next several weeks, next several months, is having a conversation, a wide-ranging conversation with scientists, engineers and elected officials to find out what can — what more can we do to make short-term progress in reducing carbons, and then working through an education process that I think is necessary, a discussion, the conversation across the country about, you know, what realistically can we do long term to make sure that this is not something we’re passing on to future generations that’s going to be very expensive and very painful to deal with.”</p>
<p>President Obama said he did not know “what either Democrats or Republicans are prepared to do at this point because it is a “partisan” issue today, unlike the past when there was “bipartisan support.”</p>
<p>“So you know, you can expect that you’ll hear more from me in the coming months and years about how we can shape an agenda that garners bipartisan support and helps move this — moves this agenda forward.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.examiner.com/article/president-obama-i-am-a-firm-believer-that-climate-change-is-real" rel="nofollow">http://www.examiner.com/article/president-obama-i-am-a-firm-believer-that-climate-change-is-real</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/15/grover-norquist-pulls-a-u-turn-on-carbon-tax-after-koch-backed-groups-pressure/#comment-141274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45117#comment-141274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The Obama Administration said last week that it has no intentions to introduce a carbon tax proposal.&quot;



So, Stephen, do you think it a wise decision to use precious time and energy to push for a carbon tax when there is zero chance of one passing the Republican House? 


We&#039;ve got a president who is working to minimize climate change.  If you want him to do more then put some energy into returning control of the House to people who care.  Attacking people on your own side is stupid foot-shooting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Obama Administration said last week that it has no intentions to introduce a carbon tax proposal.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, Stephen, do you think it a wise decision to use precious time and energy to push for a carbon tax when there is zero chance of one passing the Republican House? </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve got a president who is working to minimize climate change.  If you want him to do more then put some energy into returning control of the House to people who care.  Attacking people on your own side is stupid foot-shooting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar Maid</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/15/grover-norquist-pulls-a-u-turn-on-carbon-tax-after-koch-backed-groups-pressure/#comment-141273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solar Maid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45117#comment-141273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like the dirty fuels funding the Koch brothers, Norquist is finally waking up to the realization that his cause is not sustainable. By using strong-arm tactics that keep politicians from doing the right thing, like paying for 2 wars or blocking more tax breaks to those who fund his insane concepts, Norquist has done more harm to the GOP then any person in history. (that includes Sarah Palin) 
Keep talking and doing what you do Grover, when the history books are written, your name will appear in the footnotes as one of the crazy Tea Party idiots who&#039;s own actions brought an end to the republican party.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the dirty fuels funding the Koch brothers, Norquist is finally waking up to the realization that his cause is not sustainable. By using strong-arm tactics that keep politicians from doing the right thing, like paying for 2 wars or blocking more tax breaks to those who fund his insane concepts, Norquist has done more harm to the GOP then any person in history. (that includes Sarah Palin)<br />
Keep talking and doing what you do Grover, when the history books are written, your name will appear in the footnotes as one of the crazy Tea Party idiots who&#8217;s own actions brought an end to the republican party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dam Spahn</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/11/15/grover-norquist-pulls-a-u-turn-on-carbon-tax-after-koch-backed-groups-pressure/#comment-141259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dam Spahn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=45117#comment-141259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now we know who works for whom.  When the Kochs rise, Norquist softens.  Little surprise there. @damspahn]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we know who works for whom.  When the Kochs rise, Norquist softens.  Little surprise there. @damspahn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
