<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 30-Year-Old Solar Module Performing to Factory Specs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/30/30-year-old-solar-module-performing-to-factory-specs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/30/30-year-old-solar-module-performing-to-factory-specs/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 15:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pole</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/30/30-year-old-solar-module-performing-to-factory-specs/#comment-140678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=44544#comment-140678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/30/30-year-old-solar-module-performing-to-factory-specs/#comment-140000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=44544#comment-140000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, the price of solar is vastly overestimated in my opinion. the life of solar panels is much greater than what&#039;s used in price models]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, the price of solar is vastly overestimated in my opinion. the life of solar panels is much greater than what&#8217;s used in price models</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tibor strausz</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/30/30-year-old-solar-module-performing-to-factory-specs/#comment-139709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tibor strausz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=44544#comment-139709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thats very interesting. if panels perform 100% over 30 years than the power they produce is even cheaper than it is now. and if they perform 40 years there will be another 33% price cut!

these data will come available coming years. it seems promising.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats very interesting. if panels perform 100% over 30 years than the power they produce is even cheaper than it is now. and if they perform 40 years there will be another 33% price cut!</p>
<p>these data will come available coming years. it seems promising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wattleberry</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/30/30-year-old-solar-module-performing-to-factory-specs/#comment-139704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wattleberry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=44544#comment-139704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet more support for combined thermal/ PV  panels.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet more support for combined thermal/ PV  panels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
