Comments on: 30 Romney Lies Nailed in 1 Video

By: voiceofreason

voiceofreason — Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:36:00 +0000

“This is our country! Don’t let it be perminently lost to Dark Socialism”
don’t you mean Big buisnesses country, when the last time citizens had and control over the government? 1945?????

By: voiceofreason

voiceofreason — Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:34:00 +0000

I just love watching you americans hopelessly bicker over who you want to represent you during your countries downfall.
Republicans are saying that pushing toward socialism would be the downfall of the country, yet 8% of the 14.1 TRILLION dollar national debt is owed to a communist country. (apperently communism does work when executed correctly)
Not only does China have a lower unemployment rate, but they have a low percentage of people living under the international poverty line (2 dollar PPP a day). That taylored into a lower cost of living, I’d say maybe they’ve got the right idea.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/03/01/134159785/the-u-s-owes-china-1-2-trillion
Democrats are pushing more taxes on higher level income citizens and buisnesses, yet big buisness has discovered/created so many loopholes and paid for bills to be pushed through congress it wouldn’t matter. How is it possible a company like General Electric got away with paying less taxes than the average american citizen?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/06/most-profitable-corporations-tax-rate_n_1746817.html
It’s quite simple, elect Romney= your country collapses,
elect Obama= your country still collapses, just not as quickly as under Romney
Face the Facts: your country is Firetrucked! without the iret, and the rest of the world is sitting back and laughing at you all, as well as hopign you don’t bring down everyone else with you.

By: Bob_Wallace

Bob_Wallace — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:31:00 +0000

” Mit Romney is the first good and honest man to run in either party for many years.”

A good man? He seems to be good to his family and church members.

Honest? Mitt Romney is the most dishonest major candidate for president I’ve seen in my almost 50 years of voting. Dick Nixon was a liar, but he didn’t change his story day to day.

Mitt is an incredible liar. I’m sorry you are too blind to see how he is lying to you on a constant basis.

By: D. Liddell

D. Liddell — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:39:00 +0000

Amazing! This is the most carefully worded and well presented Hogwash I have ever seen. There are more direct lies and misrepresentations in this video than l have seen any organization try and get away with in 30 years. I’m guessing they are trying deperately to not loose the large amounts of the Croney Capitalism $$$ they are likely receiving to spin such nonscense.
Let’s get some facts straight, shall we? You get your data from the most well known left wing socialist hacks on the planet and misrepresent their information as non-partisan fact. Nothing could be further from the truth. You may habe a lot of money to create a polished official looking video but you don’t have enough money to change lies to truth! Trying to help a candidate win in this manner is an insult to tue intelegence to all that may see this and is, in fact, part of what is really the biggest problem with our country today.
People – don’t be fooled by people who would profit from borrowed money as our country goes down the toilet. they could not care less about you. Mit Romney is the first good and honest man to run in either party for many years. Please check out all the facts for yourself. Most of it can be founr in the real records themselves and from the real bipartisan fact checkers. This is our country! Don’t let it be perminently lost to Dark Socialism – Once we go down that path, there is no freedom to help us return.

The Coilition for Truth & Transparency in Government
And
The Association of Freedom, Peace, Compassion, Charity & Love

By: justmeblue5ft3

justmeblue5ft3 — Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:53:00 +0000

One day while I was at the hospital getting a mammogram,( we have one of the highest breast cancer rates in our country including men and leukemia in children) I saw the nurse receive a hospital document/report that listed the city/area as having one of the highest rates in our country for women having miscarriages. Not a pretty picture. It’s very depressing as well as dangerous. I hope that others can avoid these conditions.

By: justmeblue5ft3

justmeblue5ft3 — Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:48:00 +0000

We suffered the effects of the Nuclear power plants, and the energy was SOLD to other states. Now we suffer the results of the coal plants. It’s a nightmare.

By: justmeblue5ft3

justmeblue5ft3 — Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:45:00 +0000

That’s very true. Our state started using coal plants after they dismantled the Nuclear power plants. Many in our area suffer from lung disease, asthma, the air quality is often so bad they reccomend we do not leave the house. One person didn’t read a statement on a board one day just spewed you live in a state that pollutes our air with your filthy coal plants. Ouch. I don’t condone and I had nothing to do with their being built or operations, I’m just another suffering from the results of the very bad air quality.

By: justmeblue5ft3

justmeblue5ft3 — Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:41:00 +0000

I find this to be accurate. Thanks to the author.

By: Bob_Wallace

Bob_Wallace — Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:31:00 +0000

Yes, I am trying to twist your arm.

You and I both want a lot more progress toward getting us off fossil fuels and cleaning up our planet. We’d both like to vote for representatives senators and presidents that work tirelessly for make good things happen.

Those perfect candidates have not made it to the November ballot. At least with enough support to win.

Let’s go back to January 2009 and welcome President McCain.

Would President McCain have given us an EPA that shut down over 100 dirty coal plants? Would he have negotiated with the car companies to double efficiency requirements by 2025?

I’ll vote for making some progress over making no progress.

Even the least green representative or senator (think Landrieu of Lousiana who is in oil’s pocket) counts when it comes to deciding who has the majority.

By: Bob_Wallace

Bob_Wallace — Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:58:00 +0000

In my 68 years I’ve often gone into the polling booth and wished there were candidates who better fit my positions.

I’ve never found a race in which one of the candidates was a worst fit and if nothing else I found it in my best interest to vote against that person. I really didn’t like voting for Humphrey but had more of us done so we could have avoided Nixon.

I vote “green” when there is no chance that the most anti-green will win. That’s something that happens at times here in CA. I voted for the Green Party candidate running against Senator Feinstein because the race was not in doubt. I wouldn’t vote for someone with no chance of winning if it increased the chance of another George Bush or Richard Nixon or and of the anti-green Republican senators or representatives gaining office.

I’m going to do what I can to protect my rear end in November. I’ll use my primary vote to help create the best possible choice in November.

By: Edward Kerr

Edward Kerr — Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:01:00 +0000

I know Bob. I am struggling with this issue. I will however only vote for “green” representatives. It is a very frustrating situation. In all of my 67 years I have never seen a race where the options are so dismal. None the less, your point is well taken.
Ed

By: Bob_Wallace

Bob_Wallace — Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:16:00 +0000

” I’m still weighing voting for Jill but election day is still three weeks away. However, what is really important here is that Mr Romney not be able to get his hand anywhere near the tiller.”

Voting for Jill does nothing to help keep Mr Romney’s hand off the tiller.
Vote to protect your future in November and then work to make the next set of choices fit your agenda.

Your only reasonable option, if you don’t think PBO is a good candidate, is to play defense and keep a worse candidate out.

By: Edward Kerr

Edward Kerr — Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:09:00 +0000

If you are referring to me I beg to differ. I am NOT in the tank, as you say, for Obama. He has been a real disappointment on many levels. I’m still weighing voting for Jill but election day is still three weeks away. However, what is really important here is that Mr Romney not be able to get his hand anywhere near the tiller. He is a menace to the citizens of our nation and also to the rest of the world. I’m not pro Obama, I’m ANTI Romney.
This forum and the time that I have now is too limited to lay out my plan. However, I have posted a plan on my blog (energyquicksand.com) and you are welcome to read it and comment if you like. I would say the same to you if you support Romney’s disastrous plan, which really isn’t a plan at all.

By: Edward Kerr

Edward Kerr — Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:54:00 +0000

Because dear friend there are two main reasons why we need to avoid continuing burning (wasting a precious resource) fossil fuels and we need to decommission all nuclear plants. Fossil fuels are a withering resource (that have value far beyond our present use patterns) and alternatives (yes they exist) must be ramped up lest we get caught with our proverbial pants down.There is also the issue of climate change and it has implications that cannot be ignored. Also there are other exigent downsides to altering the atmosphere and changing the PH of the oceans. Damage to human health and to ocean resources. Romney’s energy plan is backward thinking and just plain ridiculous in light of what the world’s energy needs are now and what they will be in the future.

Nuclear energy is NOT CHEAP and the consequences of mishaps far outweigh and falsely perceived benefits. Unless you think making depleted uranium into bullets and spewing it all over “our enemies territories” is a good and moral thing, I suggest that the problem of the disposal of radioactive waste is a nightmare that we have yet to wake from. As I write this the background radiation in the northern hemisphere is far above normal due to the CONTINUING DISASTER in Japan. Can you say >cancer, genetic abnormalities and other various medical problems?

I’m sorry if you can’t grasp this Delta but I fear for your children (if you have any) as much as I do for my own.

With best personal regards,
Ed

By: 19 Delta

19 Delta — Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:23:00 +0000

Ed – share why his energy policy should be avoided like the plague? You can’t just throw statements out there like that without providing some depth.

By: Zachary Shahan

Zachary Shahan — Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:17:00 +0000

ha, wouldn’t that be something!

By: Zachary Shahan

Zachary Shahan — Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:16:00 +0000

exactly.

to be quite honest, it’s absurd that any political candidate would be for coal & oil and against clean energy. very few US citizens want dirty energy, and the vast majority love clean energy. see: http://solarlove.org/americans-love-solar-republicans-democrats-alike/
nonetheless, in politics, money speaks, and big coal and oil money are behind Romney. nascent wind and solar industries don’t have much sway over that party on the federal level.

By: Zachary Shahan

Zachary Shahan — Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:12:00 +0000

yes, been really thinking we need to focus people in on their congresspeople more. that is really the biggie.

By: Bob_Wallace

Bob_Wallace — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:49:00 +0000

Everyone I know considers fuel efficiency when car shopping. Hummer went out of business.

Everyone who buys a new car from now on is going to buy a more efficient car because each year the CAFE standards rise to the point in 2025 where they are double what they are today.

Car companies will work hard to give “big vehicle” people choices. We are seeing full sized pickups and SUVs PHEVs coming to market in the next few months.

And if you want a tire-smokin’ hot rod get yourself an EV. Check out the White Zombie…
http://electricandhybridcars.com/index.php/pages/worldsfastestcar.html

By: Bob_Wallace

Bob_Wallace — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:42:00 +0000

I agree with your sentiments.

But unlock your Caps Lock. Shouting is rude.