Fox News Likes Low-Cost Electric Vehicle Technology

Print Friendly

 
Not that they’re going soft on us, but Fox News.com recently featured an article on low-cost electric vehicle technology, and it’s just the kind of news we like to see here at CleanTechnica: good news about emerging clean technology that could break through the affordability barrier.

The article profiled a company called Simbol Materials, which is working on a low-cost lithium production process that could cut the retail price of electric vehicles down to the bone. But that’s not even the part that caught our attention….

Fox News runs positive story on low cost electric vehicles

We Built This!

The article provides a good rundown of Simbol’s low-cost process for extracting lithium from saltwater, which could then be used to lower the cost of batteries for electric vehicles.

But here’s what caught our eye: beyond giving Simbol credit for starting up a promising cleantech project, the article also takes care to credit the taxpayer-funded facilities where the process was developed, right up front in the second paragraph:

“The salt water extraction process was originally conceived at California’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) with funds from a state grant, while Argonne National Laboratory in Chicago adapted it to be used with geothermal fluids.”

Coming from the same news company that pushed the “you didn’t build that” meme against President Obama all summer, that’s a pretty striking display of “fair and balanced” reporting on the relationship between public support and private initiative in modern democratic governance.

Fox News has also been credited with leading the hysteria-tinged conservative pushback against electric vehicles, but the article doesn’t touch on that angle. It simply makes a clear, concise case for how the Simbol project would lead directly to cheaper EVs like GM’s Chevy Volt and Ford Focus Electric.

From the Laboratory to Low-Cost Electric Vehicles

LLNL and Argonne are both part of the Department of Energy’s extensive research network, which works hand in glove with the private sector to spin off new technologies into commercial production, otherwise known as technology transfer.

Back in 2009, LLNL won three prestigious awards for technology transfer from the Federal Laboratory Consortium, and one of them involved the new low-cost lithium extraction process that Simbol will put into play.

According to LLNL, the process was initially developed in aid of the geothermal industry. The aim was to find an efficient way to remove silica from geothermal brines, which otherwise clogs pipes, filters, and other equipment at geothermal plants.

The process achieves a sustainability twofer by enabling geothermal plants to run more efficiently while transforming a waste disposal problem (spent brine) into valuable products, including lithium, manganese, zinc, silica, and tungsten.


 

Fair and Balanced Reporting on Clean Technology

The FoxNews.com article hits numerous positive notes on the new process, concluding that “if producers like Simbol are successful, the price of EVs could drop dramatically.”

However, the article does make clear that’s a pretty big “if.” Simbol’s proposed lithium extraction plant is for a geothermal operation at the Salton Sea, which has a particularly high concentration of minerals. It’s not clear that the process would be cost-effective at other locations.

Fair enough. If you’re a regular reader here, you’ve probably noticed that our writers routinely issue the same type of caveats.

Meanwhile, it’s worth nothing that, from laboratory to commercialization, the whole project fits neatly into President Obama’s strategy for boosting domestic lithium production and reducing the reliance of important domestic industries on imported minerals, including the defense sector, as well as the cleantech sector.

Image (cropped): Electric vehicle by Parker Michael Knight (Some rights reserved)

Follow me on Twitter: @TinaMCasey

Tina Casey (969 Posts)

Tina Casey specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. You can also follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.


  • ed

    Please give me more specific details about O’bama’s strategy to boost domestic lithium production.

    • Bob_Wallace

      “Two plants in North Carolina and Nevada are the beneficiaries of the Obama Administration’s quest to reclaim a leadership position in lithium manufacturing, a key component of electric vehicle batteries and consumer electronics.

      The US was a leader in lithium production during the 1990s, but it now imports the majority from sources in South America, just as demand for lithium has risen rapidly.

      The Department of Energy (DOE) made a $28.4 million investment in Rockwood Lithium, a division of Rockwood Holdings (NYSE: ROC) to expand US capacity. The investment, made through the Recovery Act, came to fruition in June, when Rockwood opened its expanded manufacturing plant in North Carolina. An expanded plant in Nevada opens soon. Rockwell leveraged DOE’s investment by more than $46 million in additional private sector funding.

      Rockwood is one of 48 investments in DOE’s Vehicle Technologies Program,
      which is positioning the US to be able to supply batteries and components for over 500,000 electric vehicles a year. Funding has been dedicated to R&D efforts to make batteries safer, higher-performing and longer-lasting, and on expanding manufacturing capacity, as is the case with Rockwood Lithium.

      “With support from the Energy Department, this project will make America more competitive in a range of new technologies and will help ensure the United States leads once again in manufacturing the next generation of clean energy and advanced vehicle technologies,” says Energy Secretary Steven Chu.

      The Rockwood Lithium investment echoes DOE’s 2010 $24.6 million award to BASF Catalysts LLC for a facility in Elyria, Ohio, that
      is producing critical components of lithium-ion batteries.

      The technology is licensed from DOE’s Argonne National Lab, and when the plant is fully operational this year, it will be the most advanced cathode materials production plant in North America.”

      http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/23847

      Rockwood opened for business on July 29, 2012. Western Lithium in Nevada recently expanded. In the works is a process to recover lithium salts from geothermal waste water at the Salton Sea.

  • JMin2020

    Thanks for the post Tina. I enjoyed looking over Simbols’ website and find the technology quote promising.

  • http://www.eco.ph/ Skylights

    Breakthrough technology is always a news. That must be the rule of the media, to be always fair and balance. I’m not familiar with lithium, for now it is low cost because of its abundance, but is its resources sustainable?

    • Bob_Wallace

      There’s no lithium problem. It’s a very common metal. If we happened to use up the know concentrated deposits (which are enough to build billions of EVs) we could extract all we would ever want from ocean water. That would increase the cost of batteries some, but not a great deal. And lithium is not consumed when used in batteries, it can be reclaimed and recycled.

  • GeorgeS

    I’m sure the writer for the fox news story has been fired.

    • Nealicus

      Let’s be positive. After all, comments like these promote an “Us vs. Them” mindset that can lead to sides becoming more polarized and therefore less “fair and balanced.” Applaud good reporting when it takes place, rather than seeking revenge for past slights by taking a jab.

      I, for one, am going to go like and share the article to show support for stories and reporting like this. Fox, like any good business, will listen to its constituency, and I plan on being a voice there.

      • rkt9

        Yup, even Fox, Fair and Balanced Opinion can surprise one at times.. If only they knew that this kind of reporting is key to their survival.

        • Bob_Wallace

          What did the study find? Fox misreported climate change science 93% of the time?

          That means that they screw up about 7% of the time and let the truth sneak through….

      • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

        Ah, he was just having a little fun. Don’t think we’ve got any Fox News staff or readers over here.

        • BillTessaro

          Uhh, bit wrong there. I’m a Fox reader (as well as a lot of other sites, leftist, centrist, rightist). Rather than implying conservatives aren’t interested in clean technology you should realize many are

          • Bob_Wallace

            What does “many” mean?

            Certainly not a large enough number to push right wing politicians toward clean technology. Right now their presidential candidate is in love with coal.

          • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

            I stand corrected!

    • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

      haha :D

      and called a socialist muslim US hater.

  • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.t.peffly Matthew Todd Peffly

    I assume that the salt water process is the one being proposed to be used with the brime from desalination plants. Posted not that long ago on Cleantechnia, same plan turn a waste product into a cash source.