<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye VW Bulli EV Van, Hello 313 mpg XL1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/03/goodbye-vw-bulli-ev-van-hello-313-mpg-xl1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/03/goodbye-vw-bulli-ev-van-hello-313-mpg-xl1/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 08:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/03/goodbye-vw-bulli-ev-van-hello-313-mpg-xl1/#comment-136808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 06:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43494#comment-136808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for the typo catch. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the typo catch. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Soliday</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/03/goodbye-vw-bulli-ev-van-hello-313-mpg-xl1/#comment-136725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan Soliday]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43494#comment-136725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good writeup on the VW EV changes. 

We think you mean: 261 to 313 mpg not mph.

EVsRock!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good writeup on the VW EV changes. </p>
<p>We think you mean: 261 to 313 mpg not mph.</p>
<p>EVsRock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mk1313</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/03/goodbye-vw-bulli-ev-van-hello-313-mpg-xl1/#comment-135536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mk1313]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43494#comment-135536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European requirements are for the most part more stringent than the US.  No, there is no activity to unify the standards, it&#039;s pretty much a turf war.  It&#039;s actually pretty stupid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The European requirements are for the most part more stringent than the US.  No, there is no activity to unify the standards, it&#8217;s pretty much a turf war.  It&#8217;s actually pretty stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/03/goodbye-vw-bulli-ev-van-hello-313-mpg-xl1/#comment-135529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43494#comment-135529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the differences between US and European standards?

Is there any ongoing activity to make them the same?  It would seem like car manufactures would want unified standards as it would help them cut development costs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the differences between US and European standards?</p>
<p>Is there any ongoing activity to make them the same?  It would seem like car manufactures would want unified standards as it would help them cut development costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mk1313</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/03/goodbye-vw-bulli-ev-van-hello-313-mpg-xl1/#comment-135514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mk1313]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43494#comment-135514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not just VW.  Lot of interesting vehicles coming out in asia and europe not available here as well as other technologies.  Usually because our technical specifications are stuck in the past and it costs a lot to re-certify here when we should just be accepting the better european standards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just VW.  Lot of interesting vehicles coming out in asia and europe not available here as well as other technologies.  Usually because our technical specifications are stuck in the past and it costs a lot to re-certify here when we should just be accepting the better european standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonesey</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/03/goodbye-vw-bulli-ev-van-hello-313-mpg-xl1/#comment-135469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonesey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 06:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43494#comment-135469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click through to the original article, which Chelsea should have cut and pasted from more liberally. 261 to 313 mpg is the expected fuel efficiency. The article does not list the range.

Anyway, VW lovers in the US have been waiting very patiently for a vehicle, ANY VW vehicle, that matches or improves upon the 50 mpg highway (on biodiesel made from used vegetable oil!) performance of the (discontinued in 2005) Golf and Jetta TDI. Still waiting....

We&#039;re also waiting for ANY vehicle from VW that matches or improves upon the features of the (discontinued in 2003) Eurovan. Rear seats that face each other, pop-top with bed for camping, 22 mpg on the highway. Still waiting....

Sometimes I think VW just doesn&#039;t want to sell vehicles in the US.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click through to the original article, which Chelsea should have cut and pasted from more liberally. 261 to 313 mpg is the expected fuel efficiency. The article does not list the range.</p>
<p>Anyway, VW lovers in the US have been waiting very patiently for a vehicle, ANY VW vehicle, that matches or improves upon the 50 mpg highway (on biodiesel made from used vegetable oil!) performance of the (discontinued in 2005) Golf and Jetta TDI. Still waiting&#8230;.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re also waiting for ANY vehicle from VW that matches or improves upon the features of the (discontinued in 2003) Eurovan. Rear seats that face each other, pop-top with bed for camping, 22 mpg on the highway. Still waiting&#8230;.</p>
<p>Sometimes I think VW just doesn&#8217;t want to sell vehicles in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mk1313</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/03/goodbye-vw-bulli-ev-van-hello-313-mpg-xl1/#comment-135415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mk1313]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43494#comment-135415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[range is miles per hour?  Is that a range of miles or fuel efficiency equivalent of mpg?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>range is miles per hour?  Is that a range of miles or fuel efficiency equivalent of mpg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
