<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oxymoron of the Day: Nocturnal Photosynthesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/02/doe-grants-14-million-for-nocturnal-photosynthesis-and-poplar-tree/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/02/doe-grants-14-million-for-nocturnal-photosynthesis-and-poplar-tree/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Poundstone</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/02/doe-grants-14-million-for-nocturnal-photosynthesis-and-poplar-tree/#comment-147468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Poundstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43391#comment-147468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to see this for drought resistant crops and trees that are more resistant to wildfires]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to see this for drought resistant crops and trees that are more resistant to wildfires</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Poundstone</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/02/doe-grants-14-million-for-nocturnal-photosynthesis-and-poplar-tree/#comment-147467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Poundstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43391#comment-147467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[actually there are ways to synthesize fossil fuels from biomass, mainly through the Fischer-Tropsch process which turns biomass into a mixture of hydrogen and carbon dioxide which can be cooled down and sent through a bunch of chemical reactions, the result is truly synthetic crude oil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually there are ways to synthesize fossil fuels from biomass, mainly through the Fischer-Tropsch process which turns biomass into a mixture of hydrogen and carbon dioxide which can be cooled down and sent through a bunch of chemical reactions, the result is truly synthetic crude oil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Kerr</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/10/02/doe-grants-14-million-for-nocturnal-photosynthesis-and-poplar-tree/#comment-135184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Kerr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43391#comment-135184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article Tina,

However, as a fuel source this doesn&#039;t look very promising to me. As a forest management or soil remediation tool, great. Ethanol, regardless of it&#039;s source is not a optimal fuel. True it can be used to run engines that are designed for alcohol but when mixed with gasoline it is causing damage to engines, especially small engines. Considering the &quot;energy gain&quot;, only about 15%, it&#039;s not a great contributor to our liquid fuel needs.

To my way of thinking, based on a lot of research, I see oil from algae as the only practical replacement for fossil oil. It too can be grown on scrub land (in photobioreactors, fancy name for a green houses) and has features that ethanol lacks. It is sustainable. Scalable. Carbon neutral. A drop in fuel for our present refinery system. After the oil is extracted the remaining material has a multitude of uses. The list goes on.





]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article Tina,</p>
<p>However, as a fuel source this doesn&#8217;t look very promising to me. As a forest management or soil remediation tool, great. Ethanol, regardless of it&#8217;s source is not a optimal fuel. True it can be used to run engines that are designed for alcohol but when mixed with gasoline it is causing damage to engines, especially small engines. Considering the &#8220;energy gain&#8221;, only about 15%, it&#8217;s not a great contributor to our liquid fuel needs.</p>
<p>To my way of thinking, based on a lot of research, I see oil from algae as the only practical replacement for fossil oil. It too can be grown on scrub land (in photobioreactors, fancy name for a green houses) and has features that ethanol lacks. It is sustainable. Scalable. Carbon neutral. A drop in fuel for our present refinery system. After the oil is extracted the remaining material has a multitude of uses. The list goes on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
