<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why We Pay Double for Solar in America (But Won’t Forever)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar &#38; Wind Energy Overview −Solar Love!</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-146795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solar &#38; Wind Energy Overview −Solar Love!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-146795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the matter in a bit of depth. For example, CleanTechnica contributor John Farrell has produced a chart showing by how much the various costs of solar vary in the two countries, as part of his report on the matter, “Cut The Price Of Solar In Half By Cutting Red Tape.” [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the matter in a bit of depth. For example, CleanTechnica contributor John Farrell has produced a chart showing by how much the various costs of solar vary in the two countries, as part of his report on the matter, “Cut The Price Of Solar In Half By Cutting Red Tape.” [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice. My sister lives in Oregon and just bought a house, going to pass this on the her. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. My sister lives in Oregon and just bought a house, going to pass this on the her. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Todd Peffly</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Todd Peffly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonesey, I want to agree with you. But then my brain turns on and I ask what about all the oil, coal, gas, nuclear subsidies. I know I sound like a broken record, but I feel the same every time I hear someone say make PV/wide/new power stand on it&#039;s own two feet. But lets keep the old boys help up with support. Just the externalized health cost of coal in this the US is $0.5 Trillion a year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonesey, I want to agree with you. But then my brain turns on and I ask what about all the oil, coal, gas, nuclear subsidies. I know I sound like a broken record, but I feel the same every time I hear someone say make PV/wide/new power stand on it&#8217;s own two feet. But lets keep the old boys help up with support. Just the externalized health cost of coal in this the US is $0.5 Trillion a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Panels here cost the same, more or less.  Manufacturers sell by the container, same price to all.  Probably a better price to those who buy more container loads.

It&#039;s the non-panel costs that are hurting us.  Permit/paperwork costs are too high.  We aren&#039;t as efficient at getting systems up and going.  Some price gouging is happening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Panels here cost the same, more or less.  Manufacturers sell by the container, same price to all.  Probably a better price to those who buy more container loads.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the non-panel costs that are hurting us.  Permit/paperwork costs are too high.  We aren&#8217;t as efficient at getting systems up and going.  Some price gouging is happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it may well be that your fellow rate payers are saving money because you and others are installing solar.

We&#039;ve seen in Germany that once solar reaches a critical level (and that level is surprisingly low) that it causes a drastic decrease in midday wholesale electricity costs.
 http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/23/german-solar-bringing-down-price-of-afternoon-electricity-big-time-more-charts-facts/ 
Peak period electricity can be very expensive to purchase.  Just look at places that use TOU pricing.

The utility company can help you purchase solar, leverage their money with your investment, real estate and insurance along with existing federal and state subsidies and gain your midday input which they can pay back with much cheaper off-peak electricity.  I can see that subsidy making a lot of sense for them.

The federal subsidy is self-deflating.  It&#039;s based on 30% of system cost. 
I might be time for the state to consider reducing their subsidy or at least make it self-lowering by using the federal model.

But, consider this.  Keep subsidies high for a while.  Let solar installers make some decent money.  Those profits will attract others to the industry and create the competition which will bring down prices for all.  We need &quot;Costco&quot; installers rather than &quot;cottage industry&quot; installers.  That&#039;s what is working in Germany.  High volume, low advertising/customer acquisition costs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it may well be that your fellow rate payers are saving money because you and others are installing solar.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen in Germany that once solar reaches a critical level (and that level is surprisingly low) that it causes a drastic decrease in midday wholesale electricity costs.<br />
 <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/23/german-solar-bringing-down-price-of-afternoon-electricity-big-time-more-charts-facts/" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/23/german-solar-bringing-down-price-of-afternoon-electricity-big-time-more-charts-facts/</a><br />
Peak period electricity can be very expensive to purchase.  Just look at places that use TOU pricing.</p>
<p>The utility company can help you purchase solar, leverage their money with your investment, real estate and insurance along with existing federal and state subsidies and gain your midday input which they can pay back with much cheaper off-peak electricity.  I can see that subsidy making a lot of sense for them.</p>
<p>The federal subsidy is self-deflating.  It&#8217;s based on 30% of system cost.<br />
I might be time for the state to consider reducing their subsidy or at least make it self-lowering by using the federal model.</p>
<p>But, consider this.  Keep subsidies high for a while.  Let solar installers make some decent money.  Those profits will attract others to the industry and create the competition which will bring down prices for all.  We need &#8220;Costco&#8221; installers rather than &#8220;cottage industry&#8221; installers.  That&#8217;s what is working in Germany.  High volume, low advertising/customer acquisition costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Poundstone</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Poundstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[how much would it cost to buy solar panels from Germany and import them here?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how much would it cost to buy solar panels from Germany and import them here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonesey</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonesey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was the installer&#039;s initial estimate: 

Total cost: $14,000 ($5.00/watt)
Utility incentive: $4,000 (paid to contractor)
Federal tax credit: $4,200 (over 2-3 years)
State tax credit: $5,800 (over 4 years)

So that&#039;s zero dollars out of my pocket once I get the tax credits back in 4 years. There were a few more add-on costs that weren&#039;t in the original estimate, leaving me about $1000 out of pocket.

That is all assuming that I have enough tax liability to earn the credits and that my installer is doing the tax credit math right. We&#039;ll see what happens when I file my taxes. 

This is for a 2800W (DC) system that should yield about $200-250 in offset electric bills per year at my local (cheap!) rates. YMMV.

The utility and state tax credits are per-watt with a dollar cap that makes 2800W the sweet spot for getting you, my fellow taxpayers and utility ratepayers, to pay for my solar PV system. The federal tax credit is 30% of project costs.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was the installer&#8217;s initial estimate: </p>
<p>Total cost: $14,000 ($5.00/watt)<br />
Utility incentive: $4,000 (paid to contractor)<br />
Federal tax credit: $4,200 (over 2-3 years)<br />
State tax credit: $5,800 (over 4 years)</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s zero dollars out of my pocket once I get the tax credits back in 4 years. There were a few more add-on costs that weren&#8217;t in the original estimate, leaving me about $1000 out of pocket.</p>
<p>That is all assuming that I have enough tax liability to earn the credits and that my installer is doing the tax credit math right. We&#8217;ll see what happens when I file my taxes. </p>
<p>This is for a 2800W (DC) system that should yield about $200-250 in offset electric bills per year at my local (cheap!) rates. YMMV.</p>
<p>The utility and state tax credits are per-watt with a dollar cap that makes 2800W the sweet spot for getting you, my fellow taxpayers and utility ratepayers, to pay for my solar PV system. The federal tax credit is 30% of project costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$14,000 - 4,200 (30% federal subsidy) = $9,800.


How much of the  more than $8,800 that you didn&#039;t pay was covered by state subsidies and how much by utility subsidies?


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$14,000 &#8211; 4,200 (30% federal subsidy) = $9,800.</p>
<p>How much of the  more than $8,800 that you didn&#8217;t pay was covered by state subsidies and how much by utility subsidies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonesey</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonesey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oregon, USA.

Bob - It&#039;s not entirely about market maturity, and I agree about the fossil subsidies. Take a look at this Grist post, and the links within it, for more analysis of Germany v. US. It&#039;s thoughtful.

http://grist.org/climate-energy/why-is-rooftop-solar-cheaper-in-germany-than-in-the-u-s/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oregon, USA.</p>
<p>Bob &#8211; It&#8217;s not entirely about market maturity, and I agree about the fossil subsidies. Take a look at this Grist post, and the links within it, for more analysis of Germany v. US. It&#8217;s thoughtful.</p>
<p><a href="http://grist.org/climate-energy/why-is-rooftop-solar-cheaper-in-germany-than-in-the-u-s/" rel="nofollow">http://grist.org/climate-energy/why-is-rooftop-solar-cheaper-in-germany-than-in-the-u-s/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what state is that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what state is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Brak</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Brak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 01:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Installation costs have declined rapidly in Australia and are getting closer to German installation costs.  Technically, the US should be able to install solar at a lower cost than Australia or Germany because of its lower labour costs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installation costs have declined rapidly in Australia and are getting closer to German installation costs.  Technically, the US should be able to install solar at a lower cost than Australia or Germany because of its lower labour costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can start scaling back the subsidies once the installers are in business and the industry infrastructure is in place.

Germany has a mature solar industry.  It&#039;s ready to stand on its own.

Removing subsidies too early can damage an emerging technology and delay its maturity.

(Why is it we&#039;re still subsidizing the fossil fuel and nuclear industries and so many people want to cut off renewables, the newbys?  What could their motives be?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can start scaling back the subsidies once the installers are in business and the industry infrastructure is in place.</p>
<p>Germany has a mature solar industry.  It&#8217;s ready to stand on its own.</p>
<p>Removing subsidies too early can damage an emerging technology and delay its maturity.</p>
<p>(Why is it we&#8217;re still subsidizing the fossil fuel and nuclear industries and so many people want to cut off renewables, the newbys?  What could their motives be?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonesey</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonesey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something else that has apparently brought costs down in Germany is planned reduction in subsidies (in Germany&#039;s case, feed-in tariffs). Reducing subsidies on a regular schedule does two useful things: it motivates people to buy now, because the subsidy will never be higher; and it motivates installers to reduce their costs so that customers will continue to get a good value. 

Example: I just got solar PV installed on my house, and between the federal and state tax credits and my utility&#039;s incentive, I&#039;m paying nearly zero (less than $1000 for a $14,000  2.8 kW system, which will pay me about $250 per year in reduced bills). At that price, the installer has no incentive to bring costs down. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something else that has apparently brought costs down in Germany is planned reduction in subsidies (in Germany&#8217;s case, feed-in tariffs). Reducing subsidies on a regular schedule does two useful things: it motivates people to buy now, because the subsidy will never be higher; and it motivates installers to reduce their costs so that customers will continue to get a good value. </p>
<p>Example: I just got solar PV installed on my house, and between the federal and state tax credits and my utility&#8217;s incentive, I&#8217;m paying nearly zero (less than $1000 for a $14,000  2.8 kW system, which will pay me about $250 per year in reduced bills). At that price, the installer has no incentive to bring costs down. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-134006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-134006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Local, yes, but local often simply involves the local city/county supervisors signing on to state recommended regs.  If the feds put out a boilerplate for states to adopt then things could roll on quite fast for many states.

We don&#039;t need all 50 states to shape up at the same time, just some to take off and demonstrate a better way.  If even a couple of states got going we would see increases in installation rates.  Our three largest states have the population of Germany.

At some point even the reddest of state citizens will get fed up with the prices they are forced to pay and push for change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Local, yes, but local often simply involves the local city/county supervisors signing on to state recommended regs.  If the feds put out a boilerplate for states to adopt then things could roll on quite fast for many states.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need all 50 states to shape up at the same time, just some to take off and demonstrate a better way.  If even a couple of states got going we would see increases in installation rates.  Our three largest states have the population of Germany.</p>
<p>At some point even the reddest of state citizens will get fed up with the prices they are forced to pay and push for change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Todd Peffly</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-133980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Todd Peffly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-133980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issue is that permitting is under local control. While having a national standard template would help. It takes years for those to work their way out to all the local counties where PV hits the roof. Look how long the national build code standards take to get adopted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue is that permitting is under local control. While having a national standard template would help. It takes years for those to work their way out to all the local counties where PV hits the roof. Look how long the national build code standards take to get adopted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-133977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-133977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems to me that is would take only a few months to change the permitting process.

As supple as the American private enterprise system is and considering how many experienced construction people are looking for work I would expect we could ramp up installation number very rapidly.

Most of the labor is low-skilled grunt work.  Get the rack mounts attached to the roof.  Attach panels to roof.  Run conduit and pull wire.  Panels are becoming &#039;plug and play&#039;.  The only skilled job is seeing that the service panel tie-in is done correctly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that is would take only a few months to change the permitting process.</p>
<p>As supple as the American private enterprise system is and considering how many experienced construction people are looking for work I would expect we could ramp up installation number very rapidly.</p>
<p>Most of the labor is low-skilled grunt work.  Get the rack mounts attached to the roof.  Attach panels to roof.  Run conduit and pull wire.  Panels are becoming &#8216;plug and play&#8217;.  The only skilled job is seeing that the service panel tie-in is done correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sola</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-133972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-133972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Germans have become ridiculously efficient at solar installations.

It will take a while for any country to duplicate that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Germans have become ridiculously efficient at solar installations.</p>
<p>It will take a while for any country to duplicate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-133950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-133950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John, would you please post the numbers on which those bar segments are based (4kW cost graph)?  


What would be nice is a table with four columns - 1) Category (Panel, Inverter, etc., 2) Germany price, 3) US price, and 4) Percent Difference.


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, would you please post the numbers on which those bar segments are based (4kW cost graph)?  </p>
<p>What would be nice is a table with four columns &#8211; 1) Category (Panel, Inverter, etc., 2) Germany price, 3) US price, and 4) Percent Difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Todd Peffly</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/25/why-we-pay-double-for-solar-in-america-but-wont-forever/#comment-133910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Todd Peffly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43074#comment-133910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus many of the costs are interconnected. When it takes 365 day (or even a 100 as the NYC goal) to permitting. It cost more to get customers, you spend more time/money getting people to commit to a system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus many of the costs are interconnected. When it takes 365 day (or even a 100 as the NYC goal) to permitting. It cost more to get customers, you spend more time/money getting people to commit to a system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
