<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar Much Cheaper in Germany than US for 1 Clear Reason &#8212; Soft Costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 06:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Diego Loves Green &#8211; “Solar Freedom Now” Unveils Plan For Cutting Red Tape, Solar PV Soft Costs 50%</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-154084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[San Diego Loves Green &#8211; “Solar Freedom Now” Unveils Plan For Cutting Red Tape, Solar PV Soft Costs 50%]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 21:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-154084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] homeowners, for instance, pay only half as much as their US counterparts to have solar PV systems installed, Solar Freedom Now (SFN) notes, with [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] homeowners, for instance, pay only half as much as their US counterparts to have solar PV systems installed, Solar Freedom Now (SFN) notes, with [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar &#38; Wind Energy Overview −Solar Love!</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-146790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solar &#38; Wind Energy Overview −Solar Love!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-146790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Soft costs, red tape, acquisition costs &#8212; this is where the party&#8217;s happening (or not). But now that we&#8217;ve nailed down where the price difference is occurring, how about a bit of reflection on why it&#8217;s occurring? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Soft costs, red tape, acquisition costs &#8212; this is where the party&#8217;s happening (or not). But now that we&#8217;ve nailed down where the price difference is occurring, how about a bit of reflection on why it&#8217;s occurring? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-136208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-136208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The VAT tax is on the electricity produced.  That is not the system cost. 
Here is what your link states -

-------------
Photovoltaic tax information

By purchasing a photovoltaic installation you become an entrepreneur from a tax perspective. This means that firstly the earnings that you generated from the photovoltaic installation is recorded for income tax purposes and secondly your new photovoltaic industry is subject to VAT.
-------------

The same would happen were an American set up a large system and directly supply electricity to their neighbors in exchange for money. That money, that income, should be reported and would be taxed.

If, in fact, a utility were to pay an American for electricity fed into the grid as opposed by doing net metering the income received would be a taxable event.  The system would be treated partially as a business and, just like in Germany, it would be possible to depreciate the commercial part of the system to offset some of the income tax.

This tax stuff has nothing to do with system installation cost.   If you are able to get within ten percent of the German average you are doing quite well and should be gaining a lot of business.

But if what you are doing is misrepresenting the actual cost of German solar then you&#039;re likely to earn a &quot;used car salesman&quot; reputation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The VAT tax is on the electricity produced.  That is not the system cost.<br />
Here is what your link states &#8211;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Photovoltaic tax information</p>
<p>By purchasing a photovoltaic installation you become an entrepreneur from a tax perspective. This means that firstly the earnings that you generated from the photovoltaic installation is recorded for income tax purposes and secondly your new photovoltaic industry is subject to VAT.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>The same would happen were an American set up a large system and directly supply electricity to their neighbors in exchange for money. That money, that income, should be reported and would be taxed.</p>
<p>If, in fact, a utility were to pay an American for electricity fed into the grid as opposed by doing net metering the income received would be a taxable event.  The system would be treated partially as a business and, just like in Germany, it would be possible to depreciate the commercial part of the system to offset some of the income tax.</p>
<p>This tax stuff has nothing to do with system installation cost.   If you are able to get within ten percent of the German average you are doing quite well and should be gaining a lot of business.</p>
<p>But if what you are doing is misrepresenting the actual cost of German solar then you&#8217;re likely to earn a &#8220;used car salesman&#8221; reputation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Gulden</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-136184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Gulden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-136184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Germans pay 19% VAT tax plus an income tax on the electricity the system produces.  These costs are not included in their 1.776€/W.  Visit here and translate:
http://www.kirchner-solar-group.de/en/photovoltaic-infos/tax-information.html

When comparing apples to apples on costs, Germans are only 8.2% lower than what I am selling a system for here in the Minnesota...there industry has much greater buying power and I am a 2 man shop so I think I am doing pretty darn good.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Germans pay 19% VAT tax plus an income tax on the electricity the system produces.  These costs are not included in their 1.776€/W.  Visit here and translate:<br />
<a href="http://www.kirchner-solar-group.de/en/photovoltaic-infos/tax-information.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kirchner-solar-group.de/en/photovoltaic-infos/tax-information.html</a></p>
<p>When comparing apples to apples on costs, Germans are only 8.2% lower than what I am selling a system for here in the Minnesota&#8230;there industry has much greater buying power and I am a 2 man shop so I think I am doing pretty darn good.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-136121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-136121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VAT has no business in this discussion.  Unless it happens to be applied prior to establishing the 1.776€/W.  In that case the VAT should be backed out.

The US has no VAT.

As for your list of costs not included (scaffold renting, etc.) - really?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VAT has no business in this discussion.  Unless it happens to be applied prior to establishing the 1.776€/W.  In that case the VAT should be backed out.</p>
<p>The US has no VAT.</p>
<p>As for your list of costs not included (scaffold renting, etc.) &#8211; really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Gulden</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-136105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Gulden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-136105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a Solar PV Dealer myself (with
virtually no overhead), I have seen these latest German charts. I have
researched hundreds of German installs and for their price they do
not include professional installation in their turn-key (Gross)
costs. Other costs they do not include are annual insurance, Value
Added Tax (VAT of 19%), meter cabinet (meter socket), extra
Electrician supplies, nor scaffolding rental. 

Here is
actual German installation times:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&amp;v=y5zJwz_EG9A&amp;NR=1.
This German install consists of 18 modules (3.24kW) installed in 32
person hours (2 people times 2 days times 8 hours each day). Our
company installs 20 modules in the same 32 hours so it looks like the
installation time is very close between the two countries. This is a
far cry from 7.5 total person hours being reported lately in the graphs. It&#039;s now
obvious that there is a huge error in the transferring of information
or someone is trying to scare potential customers into not buying
solar PV by making them think the US dealers are ripping them off.
Can the people that write these articles please seek those who can
offer an apples to apples comparison, as accurate information is key
to our societies’ advancement.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a Solar PV Dealer myself (with<br />
virtually no overhead), I have seen these latest German charts. I have<br />
researched hundreds of German installs and for their price they do<br />
not include professional installation in their turn-key (Gross)<br />
costs. Other costs they do not include are annual insurance, Value<br />
Added Tax (VAT of 19%), meter cabinet (meter socket), extra<br />
Electrician supplies, nor scaffolding rental. </p>
<p>Here is<br />
actual German installation times:<br />
<span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='600' height='368' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/y5zJwz_EG9A?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span><br />
This German install consists of 18 modules (3.24kW) installed in 32<br />
person hours (2 people times 2 days times 8 hours each day). Our<br />
company installs 20 modules in the same 32 hours so it looks like the<br />
installation time is very close between the two countries. This is a<br />
far cry from 7.5 total person hours being reported lately in the graphs. It&#8217;s now<br />
obvious that there is a huge error in the transferring of information<br />
or someone is trying to scare potential customers into not buying<br />
solar PV by making them think the US dealers are ripping them off.<br />
Can the people that write these articles please seek those who can<br />
offer an apples to apples comparison, as accurate information is key<br />
to our societies’ advancement.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Subsidies Holding Back U.S. Solar Deployment? (CleanTechnica Exclusive from Jigar Shah) - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-135556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Are Subsidies Holding Back U.S. Solar Deployment? (CleanTechnica Exclusive from Jigar Shah) - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 19:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-135556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a Comment         &#160; Editor&#8217;s note: While we here at CleanTechnica have focused on the &#8216;soft costs&#8217; of solar being what differentiates solar prices in Germany (where they&amp;#821..., one of the world&#8217;s leading solar and climate change solutions entrepreneurs and investors, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a Comment         &nbsp; Editor&#8217;s note: While we here at CleanTechnica have focused on the &#8216;soft costs&#8217; of solar being what differentiates solar prices in Germany (where they&amp;#821&#8230;, one of the world&#8217;s leading solar and climate change solutions entrepreneurs and investors, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-135290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 04:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-135290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the sales tax in Germany is 19% VAT for everything you sell
- solaraenergyllc .com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the sales tax in Germany is 19% VAT for everything you sell<br />
&#8211; solaraenergyllc .com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Americans pay double for solar (but won&#039;t forever) : Renew Economy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-134048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Americans pay double for solar (but won&#039;t forever) : Renew Economy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 02:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-134048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I’ve mentioned before, the difference is mostly in “soft costs,” not hardware, and these cost barriers are solved by policy, not technological, innovation [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I’ve mentioned before, the difference is mostly in “soft costs,” not hardware, and these cost barriers are solved by policy, not technological, innovation [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-133981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-133981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;
 In Germany grounding of the array is not required, saving at least 30% of the installation cost.&quot;


30% of installation cost?  For a run of copper from roof to ground and a ground spike?    


Or is this simply a  third wire run to the service box and tied into the existing ground system (which should be even less).


&quot;Now let&#039;s add on profit and overhead per hour of $30.00 and yes, it should be per hour, not per job so that everyone makes the same amount of money in the same time period.&quot;


No.  A fair profit per system is all that should be paid.  Not a &#039;cost plus&#039; system.  


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221;<br />
 In Germany grounding of the array is not required, saving at least 30% of the installation cost.&#8221;</p>
<p>30% of installation cost?  For a run of copper from roof to ground and a ground spike?    </p>
<p>Or is this simply a  third wire run to the service box and tied into the existing ground system (which should be even less).</p>
<p>&#8220;Now let&#8217;s add on profit and overhead per hour of $30.00 and yes, it should be per hour, not per job so that everyone makes the same amount of money in the same time period.&#8221;</p>
<p>No.  A fair profit per system is all that should be paid.  Not a &#8216;cost plus&#8217; system.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-133902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-133902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, thanks for the detail! Very interesting (i.e. sad).

Yes, i hope the DOE goal of getting solar to that level will involve a LOT of red tape cutting!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks for the detail! Very interesting (i.e. sad).</p>
<p>Yes, i hope the DOE goal of getting solar to that level will involve a LOT of red tape cutting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why We Pay Double for Solar in America (But Won’t Forever) - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-133881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why We Pay Double for Solar in America (But Won’t Forever) - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-133881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I’ve mentioned before, the difference is mostly in “soft costs,” not hardware, and these cost barriers are solved by policy, not technological, innovation [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I’ve mentioned before, the difference is mostly in “soft costs,” not hardware, and these cost barriers are solved by policy, not technological, innovation [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waldulf</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-133824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[waldulf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-133824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a California based solar contractor or &quot;integrator&quot; with strong family ties to the German market I feel I can comment on this.
1. Labor Cost: California workmen&#039;s compensation insurance rates are in the 50% range, 50% of the labor paid!. In Germany that would be about 1.5%. Also, most solar installations are done by roofers and not electricians who are not used to working on steep surfaces.
2. Labor time:
- In Germany grounding of the array is not required, saving at 
  least 30% of the installation cost.
- Inverters in Germany come with plugs so that the USE-2 wire   
  and MC-4 
connectors can be plugged right in while in the US 
  everything has to be 
hardwired with metal conduit for no  
  apparent reason. 
- neither are building permits and all the associated drawings and 
   the time to schedule and attend inspections. The utility 
   companies also want to inspect and have their own paperwork 
   to submit
-  than there are excessive labeling requirements.  
- in California the incentive paperwork submittal takes at least 5 
   hours of a very competent person.
3. Materials: Labels, expensive copper grounding, conduit, connector boxes, etc. 
So, let&#039;s look at this from a business standpoint. 
In Germany they say it takes 7.5 hours per kw. Let&#039;s look at a 10 kw system. 75 hours to install in Germany, 150 here in California because of planning paperwork, grounding, inspections, labeling, hardwiring. Let&#039; assume a wage  of $25.00 per hour with an additional labor burden of $7 an hour for health insurance, social security etc.
Germany cost $32.48/hr  California cost $44.98/hr
Now let&#039;s add on profit and overhead per hour of $30.00 and yes, it should be per hour, not per job so that everyone makes the same amount of money in the same time period. Total labor invoice Germany= $62.48 x 75hrs= $4,686.00   California= $74.98 * 150hrs=$11,247.00  Difference = $6,561.00 or 66 cents per watt. 
Also, the material expenses are 20% higher because of excessive requirements. SO, lets add $0.30 per Watt for that. and add another $0.17 for California Sales Tax. And then there is liabilility insurance which is low flat rate in Germany and about 3% of Sales in California. So let&#039;s add another $0.12 just for insurance.
In my town the minimum permit cost is $600.00 adding another 6 cents. 
We are now at $1.14 per watt in justified added cost. Justified means the contractor can make the same money as in Germany. This cost difference has to do with bureaucracy and overegulation by the various government agencies. 

It is plain ironic that the Department of Energy wants to drop the prices to below $2.16 a watt when it cost us more than that to install because of other Department&#039;s requirements and regulation.

I am also comparing this to Germany which is by no means is a Banana Republic and has high quality standards, strict labor laws and much regulation in place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a California based solar contractor or &#8220;integrator&#8221; with strong family ties to the German market I feel I can comment on this.<br />
1. Labor Cost: California workmen&#8217;s compensation insurance rates are in the 50% range, 50% of the labor paid!. In Germany that would be about 1.5%. Also, most solar installations are done by roofers and not electricians who are not used to working on steep surfaces.<br />
2. Labor time:<br />
&#8211; In Germany grounding of the array is not required, saving at<br />
  least 30% of the installation cost.<br />
&#8211; Inverters in Germany come with plugs so that the USE-2 wire<br />
  and MC-4<br />
connectors can be plugged right in while in the US<br />
  everything has to be<br />
hardwired with metal conduit for no<br />
  apparent reason.<br />
&#8211; neither are building permits and all the associated drawings and<br />
   the time to schedule and attend inspections. The utility<br />
   companies also want to inspect and have their own paperwork<br />
   to submit<br />
&#8211;  than there are excessive labeling requirements.<br />
&#8211; in California the incentive paperwork submittal takes at least 5<br />
   hours of a very competent person.<br />
3. Materials: Labels, expensive copper grounding, conduit, connector boxes, etc.<br />
So, let&#8217;s look at this from a business standpoint.<br />
In Germany they say it takes 7.5 hours per kw. Let&#8217;s look at a 10 kw system. 75 hours to install in Germany, 150 here in California because of planning paperwork, grounding, inspections, labeling, hardwiring. Let&#8217; assume a wage  of $25.00 per hour with an additional labor burden of $7 an hour for health insurance, social security etc.<br />
Germany cost $32.48/hr  California cost $44.98/hr<br />
Now let&#8217;s add on profit and overhead per hour of $30.00 and yes, it should be per hour, not per job so that everyone makes the same amount of money in the same time period. Total labor invoice Germany= $62.48 x 75hrs= $4,686.00   California= $74.98 * 150hrs=$11,247.00  Difference = $6,561.00 or 66 cents per watt.<br />
Also, the material expenses are 20% higher because of excessive requirements. SO, lets add $0.30 per Watt for that. and add another $0.17 for California Sales Tax. And then there is liabilility insurance which is low flat rate in Germany and about 3% of Sales in California. So let&#8217;s add another $0.12 just for insurance.<br />
In my town the minimum permit cost is $600.00 adding another 6 cents.<br />
We are now at $1.14 per watt in justified added cost. Justified means the contractor can make the same money as in Germany. This cost difference has to do with bureaucracy and overegulation by the various government agencies. </p>
<p>It is plain ironic that the Department of Energy wants to drop the prices to below $2.16 a watt when it cost us more than that to install because of other Department&#8217;s requirements and regulation.</p>
<p>I am also comparing this to Germany which is by no means is a Banana Republic and has high quality standards, strict labor laws and much regulation in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: German Solar Power Capacity Hits All-Time High...Again - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-133676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[German Solar Power Capacity Hits All-Time High...Again - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-133676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Of course, solar power costs in Germany are much lower than elsewhere (i.e. the US), largely due economies of scale and its much lower soft costs there. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Of course, solar power costs in Germany are much lower than elsewhere (i.e. the US), largely due economies of scale and its much lower soft costs there. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Array Solar</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-133621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Array Solar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-133621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So how much an hour are US installers charging?  Ive noticed that solar pv and solar hotwater is expensive in the U.K as well for the same reasons.. Watch out for people who claim to be experts.  They usually charge too much and are terrible sales people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how much an hour are US installers charging?  Ive noticed that solar pv and solar hotwater is expensive in the U.K as well for the same reasons.. Watch out for people who claim to be experts.  They usually charge too much and are terrible sales people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captivation</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-133605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captivation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-133605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-133583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-133583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fair warning:


Bob&#039;s post-coffee math has been known to wander away from spot on accuracy.


If you&#039;d like to cook the numbers for yourself and compare you can do it here...


http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/tech_lcoe.html 



I knocked Fixed O&amp;M, Heat, and Fuel Cost to zero.  I think the other numbers are in my above post.  4.2/24 hours = 17.5% capacity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair warning:</p>
<p>Bob&#8217;s post-coffee math has been known to wander away from spot on accuracy.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to cook the numbers for yourself and compare you can do it here&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/tech_lcoe.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/tech_lcoe.html</a> </p>
<p>I knocked Fixed O&amp;M, Heat, and Fuel Cost to zero.  I think the other numbers are in my above post.  4.2/24 hours = 17.5% capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Todd Peffly</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-133573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Todd Peffly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-133573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So let me assume that Stan&#039;s &quot;offer&quot; and Bob&#039;s pre-coffee math is correct. Then a PACE program with in &quot;100 miles of So/Cntrl NJ&quot; wold mean a flood of PV there. Every time you got a a couple homes in a neighborhood converted, they would &quot;sell&quot; the rest for you &quot;customer acquisition&quot; drop and its win/win/win.  Financing is a issue for many people, we are at the tipping point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me assume that Stan&#8217;s &#8220;offer&#8221; and Bob&#8217;s pre-coffee math is correct. Then a PACE program with in &#8220;100 miles of So/Cntrl NJ&#8221; wold mean a flood of PV there. Every time you got a a couple homes in a neighborhood converted, they would &#8220;sell&#8221; the rest for you &#8220;customer acquisition&#8221; drop and its win/win/win.  Financing is a issue for many people, we are at the tipping point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-133563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-133563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;m postdrag and have recycled it several times -- definitely 100% recyclable. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m postdrag and have recycled it several times &#8212; definitely 100% recyclable. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/23/solar-much-cheaper-in-germany-than-us-for-1-clear-reason-soft-costs/#comment-133564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=43001#comment-133564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
