<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Germany Added 543 MW of Solar Power Capacity in July</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/08/germany-added-543-mw-of-solar-power-capacity-in-july/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/08/germany-added-543-mw-of-solar-power-capacity-in-july/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 15:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Altair IV</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/08/germany-added-543-mw-of-solar-power-capacity-in-july/#comment-131654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Altair IV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=42357#comment-131654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To put this in a bit of perspective, the Fukushima Daiichi Plant had six reactors for a total production ability of 4.7GW.  In half a year Germany has installed as much capacity as one of the world&#039;s largest nuclear power plants.

I assume though that the number is nameplate value only, but even taking that into consideration that&#039;s still equivalent to at least one good-sized reactor every couple of months.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put this in a bit of perspective, the Fukushima Daiichi Plant had six reactors for a total production ability of 4.7GW.  In half a year Germany has installed as much capacity as one of the world&#8217;s largest nuclear power plants.</p>
<p>I assume though that the number is nameplate value only, but even taking that into consideration that&#8217;s still equivalent to at least one good-sized reactor every couple of months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar Power Link Bonanza! - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/08/germany-added-543-mw-of-solar-power-capacity-in-july/#comment-131600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solar Power Link Bonanza! - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 14:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=42357#comment-131600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] about 1 megawatt of solar power. (Of course, it&#8217;s also a testament to how far we are behind Germany, Italy, and other leading solar power countries.) Nonetheless, kudos to Astrum Solar for hitting 1 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] about 1 megawatt of solar power. (Of course, it&#8217;s also a testament to how far we are behind Germany, Italy, and other leading solar power countries.) Nonetheless, kudos to Astrum Solar for hitting 1 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitar Mirchev</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/09/08/germany-added-543-mw-of-solar-power-capacity-in-july/#comment-131583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dimitar Mirchev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 07:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=42357#comment-131583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BSW solar graphic is old. The new one gives 1706 euro/kWp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BSW solar graphic is old. The new one gives 1706 euro/kWp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
