<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study Finds CFLs Damaging to Human Skin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/08/06/study-finds-cfls-damaging-to-human-skin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/08/06/study-finds-cfls-damaging-to-human-skin/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/08/06/study-finds-cfls-damaging-to-human-skin/#comment-129098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=41054#comment-129098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walter, I&#039;m sure glad to hear that the people in Western Alaska got their thermals in a bunch over the 4-5 milligrams (mg) of mercury in a typical cfl.

Hate to see a few milligrams of mercury added to the thousands of pounds of mercury from gold mining that goes on in the area. &quot;EPA&#039;s proposed rule will regulate the amount of mercury air emissions from point sources at mines-stacks and vents. As it is proposed, the rule would limit emissions for pre-treatment processes (roasters and autoclaves) to 149 lb/ton of ore processed at both new and existing mines. The Donlin Creek Mine intends to process 22 million tons of ore per year. That means that under the proposed rule, Donlin Creek could be permitted to emit over3200 pounds of mercury per year, just from pre-treatment processes.&quot;

I&#039;m sure that a few broken CFLs would have made a huge difference.  

BTW, 453,592 mg in a pound.  Donlin Creek =~ 1,451,494,400 broken CFLs.  But only if the EPA manages to hold Donlin emissions down to 3,200 pounds.

That&#039;s 1.45 Billion broken CFLs....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter, I&#8217;m sure glad to hear that the people in Western Alaska got their thermals in a bunch over the 4-5 milligrams (mg) of mercury in a typical cfl.</p>
<p>Hate to see a few milligrams of mercury added to the thousands of pounds of mercury from gold mining that goes on in the area. &#8220;EPA&#8217;s proposed rule will regulate the amount of mercury air emissions from point sources at mines-stacks and vents. As it is proposed, the rule would limit emissions for pre-treatment processes (roasters and autoclaves) to 149 lb/ton of ore processed at both new and existing mines. The Donlin Creek Mine intends to process 22 million tons of ore per year. That means that under the proposed rule, Donlin Creek could be permitted to emit over3200 pounds of mercury per year, just from pre-treatment processes.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that a few broken CFLs would have made a huge difference.  </p>
<p>BTW, 453,592 mg in a pound.  Donlin Creek =~ 1,451,494,400 broken CFLs.  But only if the EPA manages to hold Donlin emissions down to 3,200 pounds.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s 1.45 Billion broken CFLs&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/08/06/study-finds-cfls-damaging-to-human-skin/#comment-129096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=41054#comment-129096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can believe that.  There was so much dishonest stuff concerning the tiny bit of mercury in CFLs that I&#039;m sure some people were badly misinformed.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can believe that.  There was so much dishonest stuff concerning the tiny bit of mercury in CFLs that I&#8217;m sure some people were badly misinformed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Rose</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/08/06/study-finds-cfls-damaging-to-human-skin/#comment-129095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Rose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=41054#comment-129095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CFLs&#039; lost their sparkle in remote isolated Western Alaska when news about their mercury content leaked out. This is another nail in their coffin.

Shouldn&#039;t they also be looking for cracks in the phosphor of linear fluorescent tubes? After all, they&#039;re pretty much the same technology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CFLs&#8217; lost their sparkle in remote isolated Western Alaska when news about their mercury content leaked out. This is another nail in their coffin.</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t they also be looking for cracks in the phosphor of linear fluorescent tubes? After all, they&#8217;re pretty much the same technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
