<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electric Airplanes Could Fly Forever on Laser Beams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/24/electric-airplanes-could-fly-forever-on-laser-beams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/24/electric-airplanes-could-fly-forever-on-laser-beams/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/24/electric-airplanes-could-fly-forever-on-laser-beams/#comment-127935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40585#comment-127935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just as a small technicality, the record is 43.5% now (not very relevant to your points, but just dropping that in):
 http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/19/solar-junction-breaks-concentrated-solar-world-record-with-43-5-efficiency/ 
 http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/31/sharp-hits-concentrator-solar-cell-efficiency-record-43-5/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just as a small technicality, the record is 43.5% now (not very relevant to your points, but just dropping that in):<br />
 <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/19/solar-junction-breaks-concentrated-solar-world-record-with-43-5-efficiency/" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2011/04/19/solar-junction-breaks-concentrated-solar-world-record-with-43-5-efficiency/</a><br />
 <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/31/sharp-hits-concentrator-solar-cell-efficiency-record-43-5/" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/31/sharp-hits-concentrator-solar-cell-efficiency-record-43-5/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/24/electric-airplanes-could-fly-forever-on-laser-beams/#comment-127892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40585#comment-127892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ is it &quot;over the line&quot; because it is missing the word ?

Say right after the comma in the first sentence ....&quot;for weapons of war, I don&#039;t  they really care about energy losses&quot;....

without the word  my mind kind of just erases the word  just after the word  this makes it read rather different and makes Shecky seem not so pleasnat
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> is it &#8220;over the line&#8221; because it is missing the word ?</p>
<p>Say right after the comma in the first sentence &#8230;.&#8221;for weapons of war, I don&#8217;t  they really care about energy losses&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
<p>without the word  my mind kind of just erases the word  just after the word  this makes it read rather different and makes Shecky seem not so pleasnat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Adkins</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/24/electric-airplanes-could-fly-forever-on-laser-beams/#comment-127888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T Adkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40585#comment-127888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The PV you speak of have those efficiencies converting normal sunlight into usable power, with the lasers the PV and the lasers would be more of a matching spectrum and thus more efficient. The laser should also be able to be used over a longer distance.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The PV you speak of have those efficiencies converting normal sunlight into usable power, with the lasers the PV and the lasers would be more of a matching spectrum and thus more efficient. The laser should also be able to be used over a longer distance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/24/electric-airplanes-could-fly-forever-on-laser-beams/#comment-127805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40585#comment-127805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, Shecky, I&#039;m pretty much a peacenik.  I really dislike war.  But I do think your last comment goes over the line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Shecky, I&#8217;m pretty much a peacenik.  I really dislike war.  But I do think your last comment goes over the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shecky Vegas</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/24/electric-airplanes-could-fly-forever-on-laser-beams/#comment-127803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shecky Vegas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40585#comment-127803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Considering the initial purpose of this new tech is for weapons of war, I don&#039;t they really care about energy losses while recharging. As long as they get to kill somebody...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the initial purpose of this new tech is for weapons of war, I don&#8217;t they really care about energy losses while recharging. As long as they get to kill somebody&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsport100</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/24/electric-airplanes-could-fly-forever-on-laser-beams/#comment-127736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tsport100]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 03:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40585#comment-127736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is based on powering up PV cells using a Laser so it will not produce a very efficient system. Average PV cells are approx 20% energy efficient, the world record for triple junction cells is only 43%... meaning 60-80% in losses.

Wireless powered aircraft demo&#039;s have been around since the 1960&#039;s. William Brown demonstrated a microwave powered helicopter live on TV in 1964. This microwave radio system achieved up to 84% energy efficiency. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is based on powering up PV cells using a Laser so it will not produce a very efficient system. Average PV cells are approx 20% energy efficient, the world record for triple junction cells is only 43%&#8230; meaning 60-80% in losses.</p>
<p>Wireless powered aircraft demo&#8217;s have been around since the 1960&#8217;s. William Brown demonstrated a microwave powered helicopter live on TV in 1964. This microwave radio system achieved up to 84% energy efficiency. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
