<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Easier, Cheaper Solar Panel Installation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/17/easier-cheaper-solar-panel-installation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/17/easier-cheaper-solar-panel-installation/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 04:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Americans pay double for solar (but won&#039;t forever) : Renew Economy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/17/easier-cheaper-solar-panel-installation/#comment-134050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Americans pay double for solar (but won&#039;t forever) : Renew Economy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 02:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40270#comment-134050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you add potential hardware innovations (e.g. like this) to the soft cost reduction opportunity, the cost of solar is likely to keep falling rapidly in the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you add potential hardware innovations (e.g. like this) to the soft cost reduction opportunity, the cost of solar is likely to keep falling rapidly in the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why We Pay Double for Solar in America (But Won’t Forever) - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/17/easier-cheaper-solar-panel-installation/#comment-133880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why We Pay Double for Solar in America (But Won’t Forever) - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40270#comment-133880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you add potential hardware innovations (e.g. like this) to the soft cost reduction opportunity, the cost of solar is likely to keep falling rapidly in the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you add potential hardware innovations (e.g. like this) to the soft cost reduction opportunity, the cost of solar is likely to keep falling rapidly in the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Solar Panel Designs Make Installation Cheaper &#124; Planetsave</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/17/easier-cheaper-solar-panel-installation/#comment-127578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Solar Panel Designs Make Installation Cheaper &#124; Planetsave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40270#comment-127578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Solon has two easy-to-install offerings, SOLquick and SOLfixx. &#8220;SOLquick is intended for non-metal commercial roofs; SOLfixx for rooftops that can bear less weight. Both require flat roof surfaces,&#8221; sister site CleanTechnica notes. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Solon has two easy-to-install offerings, SOLquick and SOLfixx. &#8220;SOLquick is intended for non-metal commercial roofs; SOLfixx for rooftops that can bear less weight. Both require flat roof surfaces,&#8221; sister site CleanTechnica notes. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/17/easier-cheaper-solar-panel-installation/#comment-127227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40270#comment-127227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome, thanks for the link! Will probably be seeing it soon in my RSS feed, but you got to me first. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, thanks for the link! Will probably be seeing it soon in my RSS feed, but you got to me first. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuclear</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/17/easier-cheaper-solar-panel-installation/#comment-127150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40270#comment-127150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great.  

Seems the panel cost / watt has gone down to 76 cents / watt now.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/analysis-u-solar-tariffs-not-204842702.html 

Soon the panels will come with inbuilt invertor which will make it even more easier to install.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great.  </p>
<p>Seems the panel cost / watt has gone down to 76 cents / watt now.<br />
<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/analysis-u-solar-tariffs-not-204842702.html " rel="nofollow">http://finance.yahoo.com/news/analysis-u-solar-tariffs-not-204842702.html </a></p>
<p>Soon the panels will come with inbuilt invertor which will make it even more easier to install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
