<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Rebuffs Green Certification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/12/apple-rebuffs-green-certification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/12/apple-rebuffs-green-certification/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 09:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: basicmetals</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/12/apple-rebuffs-green-certification/#comment-210546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[basicmetals]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40083#comment-210546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great Apple ...that&#039;s growing///]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Apple &#8230;that&#8217;s growing///</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Jumps Back on EPEAT Bandwagon - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/12/apple-rebuffs-green-certification/#comment-126600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Jumps Back on EPEAT Bandwagon - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 12:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40083#comment-126600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Cooney Leave a Comment   Pin It &#160; Eduitor&#8217;s Note: So, as Chelsea noted the other day, Apple decided this week that it no longer meshed with the eco-label EPEAT. As a response, San Francisco told Apple it was [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Cooney Leave a Comment   Pin It &nbsp; Eduitor&#8217;s Note: So, as Chelsea noted the other day, Apple decided this week that it no longer meshed with the eco-label EPEAT. As a response, San Francisco told Apple it was [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco City Officials May Stop Buying Apple - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/12/apple-rebuffs-green-certification/#comment-126565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[San Francisco City Officials May Stop Buying Apple - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 00:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40083#comment-126565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Apple pulled out of a green certification program this week, San Francisco city officials have decided to stop buying the company&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Apple pulled out of a green certification program this week, San Francisco city officials have decided to stop buying the company&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/12/apple-rebuffs-green-certification/#comment-126429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40083#comment-126429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks. Would hope so. Just hope they soon come out with a better standard. 
But Apple&#039;s sort of ridiculous shortcomings still stand out as problematic: they
make their products virtually non-repairable and non-upgradeable, so they end up in landfills very quickly, even when they simply run out of memory]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Would hope so. Just hope they soon come out with a better standard.<br />
But Apple&#8217;s sort of ridiculous shortcomings still stand out as problematic: they<br />
make their products virtually non-repairable and non-upgradeable, so they end up in landfills very quickly, even when they simply run out of memory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isail</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/12/apple-rebuffs-green-certification/#comment-126370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isail]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 07:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40083#comment-126370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops, that was Dalrymple&#039;s post (that Gruber linked to).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, that was Dalrymple&#8217;s post (that Gruber linked to).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isail</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/12/apple-rebuffs-green-certification/#comment-126369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isail]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 07:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=40083#comment-126369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the missed point is that Apple argues that the EPEAT certification doesnt include a lot of green features that Apple does provide. I read this as a Apple&#039;s way of saying &quot;time to update the EPEAT&quot; requirements. See Gruber&#039;s post http://www.loopinsight.com/2012/07/10/apple-responds-to-epeat-concerns/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the missed point is that Apple argues that the EPEAT certification doesnt include a lot of green features that Apple does provide. I read this as a Apple&#8217;s way of saying &#8220;time to update the EPEAT&#8221; requirements. See Gruber&#8217;s post <a href="http://www.loopinsight.com/2012/07/10/apple-responds-to-epeat-concerns/" rel="nofollow">http://www.loopinsight.com/2012/07/10/apple-responds-to-epeat-concerns/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
