<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double-Sided Solar Cells from BSolar Produce Up to 50% More Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/07/double-sided-solar-cells-from-bsolar-produce-up-to-50-more-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/07/double-sided-solar-cells-from-bsolar-produce-up-to-50-more-energy/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bSolar Introduces High-Efficiency Bifacial Silicon Solar Cells and Modules in the US</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/07/double-sided-solar-cells-from-bsolar-produce-up-to-50-more-energy/#comment-131822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bSolar Introduces High-Efficiency Bifacial Silicon Solar Cells and Modules in the US]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39898#comment-131822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] high-efficiency, bifacial, photovoltaic (PV), crystalline silicon solar cells and modules. Bifacial modules collect sunlight on their rear sides to generate 10%-30% additional electricity and much higher project IRR and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] high-efficiency, bifacial, photovoltaic (PV), crystalline silicon solar cells and modules. Bifacial modules collect sunlight on their rear sides to generate 10%-30% additional electricity and much higher project IRR and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/07/double-sided-solar-cells-from-bsolar-produce-up-to-50-more-energy/#comment-126452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39898#comment-126452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No prob. I had to double-check. :D

And yeah, I think where people have enough space, convention PV panels will trump these. But I&#039;m not technically advanced enough to make any claims. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No prob. I had to double-check. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>And yeah, I think where people have enough space, convention PV panels will trump these. But I&#8217;m not technically advanced enough to make any claims. <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dadsolar</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/07/double-sided-solar-cells-from-bsolar-produce-up-to-50-more-energy/#comment-126441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dadsolar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39898#comment-126441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they are mono-crystalline, they may have a beneficial aspect ... thanks again !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they are mono-crystalline, they may have a beneficial aspect &#8230; thanks again !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dadsolar</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/07/double-sided-solar-cells-from-bsolar-produce-up-to-50-more-energy/#comment-126439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dadsolar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39898#comment-126439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, I must have ... the other fact is that because the thin-film may have a lower efficiency rate, you may be better off to add more PV modules, than use the double sided PV, especially in the mid latitudes ... Sorry for the miss-read, I do appreciate that point ... !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I must have &#8230; the other fact is that because the thin-film may have a lower efficiency rate, you may be better off to add more PV modules, than use the double sided PV, especially in the mid latitudes &#8230; Sorry for the miss-read, I do appreciate that point &#8230; !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/07/double-sided-solar-cells-from-bsolar-produce-up-to-50-more-energy/#comment-126422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39898#comment-126422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think you misread -- BSolar is not BP Solar:  http://www.b-solar.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think you misread &#8212; BSolar is not BP Solar:  <a href="http://www.b-solar.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.b-solar.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dadsolar</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/07/double-sided-solar-cells-from-bsolar-produce-up-to-50-more-energy/#comment-126333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dadsolar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39898#comment-126333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too bad BP has left the PV business ... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad BP has left the PV business &#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/07/double-sided-solar-cells-from-bsolar-produce-up-to-50-more-energy/#comment-126064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39898#comment-126064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the important caveat in that case that space isn&#039;t a contraint for those planning the installation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the important caveat in that case that space isn&#8217;t a contraint for those planning the installation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave keen</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/07/double-sided-solar-cells-from-bsolar-produce-up-to-50-more-energy/#comment-126036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave keen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39898#comment-126036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sound like a good idea, but it would be better just to have more solar panel mounted around the place, you never will achieve max power out of the solar cell in this setup.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sound like a good idea, but it would be better just to have more solar panel mounted around the place, you never will achieve max power out of the solar cell in this setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
