<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Imagine the Fuel Cell that Keeps Running After the Hydrogen Runs Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/02/imagine-the-fuel-cell-that-keeps-running-after-the-hydrogen-runs-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/02/imagine-the-fuel-cell-that-keeps-running-after-the-hydrogen-runs-out/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/07/02/imagine-the-fuel-cell-that-keeps-running-after-the-hydrogen-runs-out/#comment-125529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39661#comment-125529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s interesting, but should we be impressed?

I don&#039;t see anything about this fuel cell being more efficient, just that it continues to produce power &quot;3 minutes, 30 seconds&quot; after the fuel is shut off/runs out.

In practical use it would mean that you&#039;d have to shut your FCEV down a few minutes before you arrived at your destination in order to not waste energy.  (Unless this device can store that 00:03:30 without self discharge.)

In their example of a fuel cell airplane, you could get the same flight time by simply burning fuel a bit slower.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting, but should we be impressed?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see anything about this fuel cell being more efficient, just that it continues to produce power &#8220;3 minutes, 30 seconds&#8221; after the fuel is shut off/runs out.</p>
<p>In practical use it would mean that you&#8217;d have to shut your FCEV down a few minutes before you arrived at your destination in order to not waste energy.  (Unless this device can store that 00:03:30 without self discharge.)</p>
<p>In their example of a fuel cell airplane, you could get the same flight time by simply burning fuel a bit slower.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
