<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AGL and First Solar to Deliver 159 MW in NSW Solar Projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/29/agl-and-first-solar-to-deliver-159-mw-in-nsw-solar-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/29/agl-and-first-solar-to-deliver-159-mw-in-nsw-solar-projects/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/29/agl-and-first-solar-to-deliver-159-mw-in-nsw-solar-projects/#comment-125331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39606#comment-125331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who is to blame? Looking at Grid Australia and the Australian Energy Regulator they both look like they&#039;ve got a legacy  view of the world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is to blame? Looking at Grid Australia and the Australian Energy Regulator they both look like they&#8217;ve got a legacy  view of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Brak</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/29/agl-and-first-solar-to-deliver-159-mw-in-nsw-solar-projects/#comment-125327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Brak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39606#comment-125327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So they are building grid only solar which gives about a third of the return of point of use solar at only about 10% less than the cost of point of use solar?  I&#039;d call that an epic fail, except that it will reduce coal use which is currently killing people and so is an even greater fail.  But it is a huge missed opportunity.  Why not use the money to install point of use solar in locations where it is needed to prevent expensive upgrades in transmission infrastructure?  I&#039;m afraid some people are not really thinking things through here in Australia.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they are building grid only solar which gives about a third of the return of point of use solar at only about 10% less than the cost of point of use solar?  I&#8217;d call that an epic fail, except that it will reduce coal use which is currently killing people and so is an even greater fail.  But it is a huge missed opportunity.  Why not use the money to install point of use solar in locations where it is needed to prevent expensive upgrades in transmission infrastructure?  I&#8217;m afraid some people are not really thinking things through here in Australia.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
