<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All-Carbon Solar Cell Harnesses Infrared Light</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/22/all-carbon-solar-cell-harnesses-infrared-light/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/22/all-carbon-solar-cell-harnesses-infrared-light/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/22/all-carbon-solar-cell-harnesses-infrared-light/#comment-125264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39327#comment-125264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this is from MIT. i assume they ran their statements by the researchers... but you never know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is from MIT. i assume they ran their statements by the researchers&#8230; but you never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icpcwsith</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/22/all-carbon-solar-cell-harnesses-infrared-light/#comment-125171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[icpcwsith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39327#comment-125171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone found the title of the paper they published  please?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone found the title of the paper they published  please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Kerr</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/22/all-carbon-solar-cell-harnesses-infrared-light/#comment-124864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Kerr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39327#comment-124864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can imagine a solar cell that is able utilize the entire electromagnetic spectrum. Able to turn all radiation, from long wave radio all the way up to gamma rays, into an electrical current. (but I can imagine a lot of strange stuff)...

In any event, it&#039;s good to know that research into advanced &quot;green energy&quot; production capability is continuing in spite of the chaos that has become rampant in the political realm with all of the denial of the problem, finger pointing about &quot;Solyndra&quot; type fiascoes and the childish polarity that defines the parties these days.  

Regardless, I remain buoyed about the long term outlook providing that we actually develop the &quot;alternatives&quot; presently available as quickly as possible. The main issue here remains being able to abandon First coal and then petroleum as we continue to search for greater efficiency in our developing &quot;New Energy Paradigm&quot;. Logic dictates that we accomplish this task or risk some truly catastrophic consequences.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can imagine a solar cell that is able utilize the entire electromagnetic spectrum. Able to turn all radiation, from long wave radio all the way up to gamma rays, into an electrical current. (but I can imagine a lot of strange stuff)&#8230;</p>
<p>In any event, it&#8217;s good to know that research into advanced &#8220;green energy&#8221; production capability is continuing in spite of the chaos that has become rampant in the political realm with all of the denial of the problem, finger pointing about &#8220;Solyndra&#8221; type fiascoes and the childish polarity that defines the parties these days.  </p>
<p>Regardless, I remain buoyed about the long term outlook providing that we actually develop the &#8220;alternatives&#8221; presently available as quickly as possible. The main issue here remains being able to abandon First coal and then petroleum as we continue to search for greater efficiency in our developing &#8220;New Energy Paradigm&#8221;. Logic dictates that we accomplish this task or risk some truly catastrophic consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/22/all-carbon-solar-cell-harnesses-infrared-light/#comment-124801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39327#comment-124801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree 0.1 sounds really low. But efficiency is a interesting number. When you read 12% efficiency for a solar panel it isn&#039;t for the total spectrum or energy that the sun puts out (hits the surface of the earth). It is for the range that it can convert. If that is true then you have to look at a few things. Let me use solar NRG as the solar radition that reaches the ground (your panel). Yes this varis based on local, month, clouds, ...

What portion of the solar NRG is in the band converted by panels (pn%) and panel eff (pe%)

What portion of the NRG is in the near infrared (rn%) and coating eff (re%)

Also remember that the solar panel emits most of the NRG it doesn&#039;t convert back out as infrared, but lets ignore that but it would increase the amount to infrared radition that the coating could convert.

So energey produced by panel is pn*pe*NRG
energy produced by coating is rn*re*NRG.

So depending on the rn verse pn they may in fact be close.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree 0.1 sounds really low. But efficiency is a interesting number. When you read 12% efficiency for a solar panel it isn&#8217;t for the total spectrum or energy that the sun puts out (hits the surface of the earth). It is for the range that it can convert. If that is true then you have to look at a few things. Let me use solar NRG as the solar radition that reaches the ground (your panel). Yes this varis based on local, month, clouds, &#8230;</p>
<p>What portion of the solar NRG is in the band converted by panels (pn%) and panel eff (pe%)</p>
<p>What portion of the NRG is in the near infrared (rn%) and coating eff (re%)</p>
<p>Also remember that the solar panel emits most of the NRG it doesn&#8217;t convert back out as infrared, but lets ignore that but it would increase the amount to infrared radition that the coating could convert.</p>
<p>So energey produced by panel is pn*pe*NRG<br />
energy produced by coating is rn*re*NRG.</p>
<p>So depending on the rn verse pn they may in fact be close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nameruin</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/22/all-carbon-solar-cell-harnesses-infrared-light/#comment-124761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nameruin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=39327#comment-124761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seriously? 
&quot;efficiency of only about 0.1 percent&quot; seems like a pretty far and long way from “we are very much on the path to making very high efficiency near-infrared solar cells&quot;... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously?<br />
&#8220;efficiency of only about 0.1 percent&#8221; seems like a pretty far and long way from “we are very much on the path to making very high efficiency near-infrared solar cells&#8221;&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
