<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REN21, UNEP Reports Highlight Challenges Amid Record Renewable Energy Growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/12/ren21-unep-reports-highlight-challenges-amid-record-renewable-energy-growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/12/ren21-unep-reports-highlight-challenges-amid-record-renewable-energy-growth/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/12/ren21-unep-reports-highlight-challenges-amid-record-renewable-energy-growth/#comment-123870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38997#comment-123870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[not sure. it acts up sometimes. will edit the comments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure. it acts up sometimes. will edit the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/12/ren21-unep-reports-highlight-challenges-amid-record-renewable-energy-growth/#comment-123862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38997#comment-123862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Hmmm, what happened here? I thought the paste function wasn&#039;t working. Seems it pasted some sort of hidden text.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Hmmm, what happened here? I thought the paste function wasn&#8217;t working. Seems it pasted some sort of hidden text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/12/ren21-unep-reports-highlight-challenges-amid-record-renewable-energy-growth/#comment-123861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38997#comment-123861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;This accounted for 31% of actual new
power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind
capacity.&quot;

Thank you. 

I always get annoyed when capacity additions are compared only on nameplate capacity, because it paints too rosy a picture.


This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (http://s.tt/1eaYP)ssss
This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (http://s.tt/1eaYP)This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (http://s.tt/1eaYP)
This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (http://s.tt/1eaYP)
This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (http://s.tt/1eaYP)
This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (http://s.tt/1eaYP)&quot;This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (http://s.tt/1eaYP)
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This accounted for 31% of actual new<br />
power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind<br />
capacity.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thank you. </p>
<p>I always get annoyed when capacity additions are compared only on nameplate capacity, because it paints too rosy a picture.</p>
<p>This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (<a href="http://s.tt/1eaYP" rel="nofollow">http://s.tt/1eaYP</a>)ssss<br />
This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (<a href="http://s.tt/1eaYP" rel="nofollow">http://s.tt/1eaYP</a>)This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (<a href="http://s.tt/1eaYP" rel="nofollow">http://s.tt/1eaYP</a>)<br />
This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (<a href="http://s.tt/1eaYP" rel="nofollow">http://s.tt/1eaYP</a>)<br />
This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (<a href="http://s.tt/1eaYP" rel="nofollow">http://s.tt/1eaYP</a>)<br />
This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (<a href="http://s.tt/1eaYP" rel="nofollow">http://s.tt/1eaYP</a>)&#8221;This accounted for 31% of actual new power generated, due to lower capacity factors for solar and wind capacity.Source: Clean Technica (<a href="http://s.tt/1eaYP" rel="nofollow">http://s.tt/1eaYP</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
