<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar Panel Technology Advancements Infographic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/10/solar-panel-technology-advancements-infographic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/10/solar-panel-technology-advancements-infographic/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 06:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/10/solar-panel-technology-advancements-infographic/#comment-123713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38926#comment-123713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paying more per watt might make sense if it cuts installation/real estate costs more than the price difference.

Right now residential roof installation rates are greater than $5/watt in the US.  If you could pay a buck more per watt for panel but then save a buck-fifty on mounting costs it would make sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paying more per watt might make sense if it cuts installation/real estate costs more than the price difference.</p>
<p>Right now residential roof installation rates are greater than $5/watt in the US.  If you could pay a buck more per watt for panel but then save a buck-fifty on mounting costs it would make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kriss Bergethon</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/10/solar-panel-technology-advancements-infographic/#comment-123712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kriss Bergethon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38926#comment-123712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right Dcard, we are trying to give a general idea on averages.  Sunpower&#039;s stuff is indeed more expensive AND more efficient.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Dcard, we are trying to give a general idea on averages.  Sunpower&#8217;s stuff is indeed more expensive AND more efficient.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kriss Bergethon</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/10/solar-panel-technology-advancements-infographic/#comment-123652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kriss Bergethon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38926#comment-123652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Anne, you are sharp!  We were trying to show relative size and scale and maybe should have been a little more in our calculations.  The point is that the panels are getting incredibly small, efficient, and affordable.  Thanks for checking us!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anne, you are sharp!  We were trying to show relative size and scale and maybe should have been a little more in our calculations.  The point is that the panels are getting incredibly small, efficient, and affordable.  Thanks for checking us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dcard88</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/10/solar-panel-technology-advancements-infographic/#comment-123611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dcard88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38926#comment-123611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This inforgraphic is (must be) based on average efficiency in the marketplace since Sun Power is already producing 20% panels.  Also the average price since Sunpower is also more expensive at well over $2/watt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This inforgraphic is (must be) based on average efficiency in the marketplace since Sun Power is already producing 20% panels.  Also the average price since Sunpower is also more expensive at well over $2/watt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/10/solar-panel-technology-advancements-infographic/#comment-123600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38926#comment-123600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is  an error in this image. A 41&quot; x 25&quot; panel is 1.04 m x .635 m and has an area of .66 m2. At 23% efficiency, it will have an STC rating of .66 * .235 1000 = 155 W.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is  an error in this image. A 41&#8243; x 25&#8243; panel is 1.04 m x .635 m and has an area of .66 m2. At 23% efficiency, it will have an STC rating of .66 * .235 1000 = 155 W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToddInNorway</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/10/solar-panel-technology-advancements-infographic/#comment-123595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ToddInNorway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38926#comment-123595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Semprius is very close to commercial production of their proprietary concentrating PV panel which will likely achieve &gt; 25% conversion efficiency. It has a prototype that achieved &gt;33% conversion efficiency. The engineering giant Siemens has bought a major share in Semprius, which would indicate some credibility to the technology. There is a good chance their $/watt production cost will be even lower than $0.70/watt in your figure. So the innovation engine in PV is working perhaps even better than we have hoped for!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Semprius is very close to commercial production of their proprietary concentrating PV panel which will likely achieve &gt; 25% conversion efficiency. It has a prototype that achieved &gt;33% conversion efficiency. The engineering giant Siemens has bought a major share in Semprius, which would indicate some credibility to the technology. There is a good chance their $/watt production cost will be even lower than $0.70/watt in your figure. So the innovation engine in PV is working perhaps even better than we have hoped for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
