<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Storm to End Fossil Fuel Subsidies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/twitter-storm-to-end-fossil-fuel-subsidies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/twitter-storm-to-end-fossil-fuel-subsidies/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parichag</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/twitter-storm-to-end-fossil-fuel-subsidies/#comment-123627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parichag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38902#comment-123627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is some environmental gobble gook. What are the subsidies for? Do they use them to research clean oil technologies, are they used to subsidize basic research into safer cleaner ways of providing energy? Are the subsidies helping to create jobs throughout the economy? Are the subsidies related to other technologies like software development, global supply chain effectiveness, automotive technology upgrades? Any of these types of subsidies have intended and unintended consequences. BTW, coal is not used in the variety of ways as oil and natural gas, so obviously there are more subsidies going to oil and natural gas research and development.
No, I don&#039;t work for the oil industry in any way, but to reduce the subsidies may have unintended consequences - the least of which may be a massive layoffs or even the death of certain other industries like plastics or roads, construction packaging or even basic research. Reducing subsidies on one industry ignores the possible unintended consequences of economic disasters in other industries and even some governments might be impacted by this. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is some environmental gobble gook. What are the subsidies for? Do they use them to research clean oil technologies, are they used to subsidize basic research into safer cleaner ways of providing energy? Are the subsidies helping to create jobs throughout the economy? Are the subsidies related to other technologies like software development, global supply chain effectiveness, automotive technology upgrades? Any of these types of subsidies have intended and unintended consequences. BTW, coal is not used in the variety of ways as oil and natural gas, so obviously there are more subsidies going to oil and natural gas research and development.<br />
No, I don&#8217;t work for the oil industry in any way, but to reduce the subsidies may have unintended consequences &#8211; the least of which may be a massive layoffs or even the death of certain other industries like plastics or roads, construction packaging or even basic research. Reducing subsidies on one industry ignores the possible unintended consequences of economic disasters in other industries and even some governments might be impacted by this. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill_Woods</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/twitter-storm-to-end-fossil-fuel-subsidies/#comment-123552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill_Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38902#comment-123552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the OECD report of a while ago, direct subsidies for fossil fuels in 2010 from Canadian governments (millions of Canadian dollars): 

Coal:   9.72 
Oil: 1356
Gas: 654 

from Tables 4.1–3 on pages 82–84 of  http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/40/35/48805150.pdf 
from http://www.oecd.org/document/32/0,3746,en_21571361_48776931_48783776_1_1_1_1,00.html

Per unit of consumption, that works out to about  
Coal:   9.72 M$ /  52.5 Mt    = 0.19 CND per ton 
Oil: 1356 M$ /   788 Mbbl  = 1.72 CND per barrel 
Gas:  654 M$ / 2,936 Bft^3 = 0.22 CND per thousand cubic feet

http://www.eia.gov/countries/country-data.cfm?fips=CA&amp;trk=p1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the OECD report of a while ago, direct subsidies for fossil fuels in 2010 from Canadian governments (millions of Canadian dollars): </p>
<p>Coal:   9.72<br />
Oil: 1356<br />
Gas: 654 </p>
<p>from Tables 4.1–3 on pages 82–84 of  <a href="http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/40/35/48805150.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/40/35/48805150.pdf</a><br />
from <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/32/0,3746,en_21571361_48776931_48783776_1_1_1_1,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oecd.org/document/32/0,3746,en_21571361_48776931_48783776_1_1_1_1,00.html</a></p>
<p>Per unit of consumption, that works out to about<br />
Coal:   9.72 M$ /  52.5 Mt    = 0.19 CND per ton<br />
Oil: 1356 M$ /   788 Mbbl  = 1.72 CND per barrel<br />
Gas:  654 M$ / 2,936 Bft^3 = 0.22 CND per thousand cubic feet</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eia.gov/countries/country-data.cfm?fips=CA&#038;trk=p1" rel="nofollow">http://www.eia.gov/countries/country-data.cfm?fips=CA&#038;trk=p1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Oil Drum &#124; Drumbeat: June 9, 2012</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/twitter-storm-to-end-fossil-fuel-subsidies/#comment-123526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Oil Drum &#124; Drumbeat: June 9, 2012]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38902#comment-123526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/twitter-storm-to-end-fossil-fuel-subsidies/#comment-123518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 11:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38902#comment-123518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yep, we just covered that as well: http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/leveling-the-energy-playing-field-senate-bill-to-allow-renewable-energy-mlps/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, we just covered that as well: <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/leveling-the-energy-playing-field-senate-bill-to-allow-renewable-energy-mlps/" rel="nofollow">http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/leveling-the-energy-playing-field-senate-bill-to-allow-renewable-energy-mlps/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/twitter-storm-to-end-fossil-fuel-subsidies/#comment-123517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38902#comment-123517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i don&#039;t. i know some folks are working on a comprehensive wiki on energy subsidies, but no announcements yet on it... in development.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t. i know some folks are working on a comprehensive wiki on energy subsidies, but no announcements yet on it&#8230; in development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleantech &#38; The Wizard of Oz - CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/twitter-storm-to-end-fossil-fuel-subsidies/#comment-123512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cleantech &#38; The Wizard of Oz - CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 09:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38902#comment-123512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] political leaders we have are yet to show that they care enough about these crises to cut fossil fuel subsidies and push cleantech into the position it is set to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] political leaders we have are yet to show that they care enough about these crises to cut fossil fuel subsidies and push cleantech into the position it is set to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoshhash</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/twitter-storm-to-end-fossil-fuel-subsidies/#comment-123481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yoshhash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38902#comment-123481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What an awesome and well-focused campaign!  Does anyone have a link to a current compilation of what these subsidies are around the world, (ie Canada?)  Info I am finding is quite spotty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an awesome and well-focused campaign!  Does anyone have a link to a current compilation of what these subsidies are around the world, (ie Canada?)  Info I am finding is quite spotty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis baker</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/twitter-storm-to-end-fossil-fuel-subsidies/#comment-123468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dennis baker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38902#comment-123468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Would Allow Renewable Energy Projects to Use Tax Benefits Reserved for Fossil Fuels
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41769.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Would Allow Renewable Energy Projects to Use Tax Benefits Reserved for Fossil Fuels<br />
<a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41769.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41769.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
