<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Healing Power of New Energy (Friday Fun)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/the-healing-power-of-new-energy-friday-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/the-healing-power-of-new-energy-friday-fun/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 10:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Shahan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/the-healing-power-of-new-energy-friday-fun/#comment-123516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zachary Shahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 11:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38899#comment-123516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[another excellent one! :D

well presented and odd fact.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another excellent one! <img src="http://cleantechnica.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>well presented and odd fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captivation</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2012/06/08/the-healing-power-of-new-energy-friday-fun/#comment-123461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captivation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=38899#comment-123461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It just sort of hit me today that Climate Deniers have low risk tolerance for fairly safe activities: biking, vegetarian food, renewable energy investments.  But the same Climate Deniers have insanely high risk tolerance for activities that collectively put humans at risk: nuclear waste, toxic emissions, climate change.
Could the central conservative flaw be that they focused all their peanut butter on the individual risk side of the sandwich and had none left for the collective risk side?  If so, we need to teach people to use a butter knife to cover the risks more evenly.  Exposure to small individual dangers is preferable to big collective ones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just sort of hit me today that Climate Deniers have low risk tolerance for fairly safe activities: biking, vegetarian food, renewable energy investments.  But the same Climate Deniers have insanely high risk tolerance for activities that collectively put humans at risk: nuclear waste, toxic emissions, climate change.<br />
Could the central conservative flaw be that they focused all their peanut butter on the individual risk side of the sandwich and had none left for the collective risk side?  If so, we need to teach people to use a butter knife to cover the risks more evenly.  Exposure to small individual dangers is preferable to big collective ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
